F0IV 57 Tau appears to be the best available primary F0IV standard, with eps Cep as a good secondary standard. mu Cet should probably be avoided. There are no F0IV anchor points (Garrison94), indeed no subgiant anchors earlier than G0IV. Garcia89 lists 3 F0IV standards: HD 17094 (mu Cet), HD 27397 (57 Tau), and HD 211336 (eps Cep). Similar to the late As, F0IV subgiant standards tend to be not far from the main sequence. Comments on color trends of F subgiants vs. F dwarfs are appended at the end of this file. JM53 standard: mu Cet - F0IV eps Cep - F0IV JM53 non-standard: zet02 Lyr - F0IV MorganAbt72 standard: del Aql (=HR 7377) - F0IV MK73 standard: 57 Tau (=HR 1351) - F0IV Cowley74 standards: 57 Tau - F0IV mu Cet - F0IV eps Cep - F0IV Cowley76 standard: del Aql - F0IV MK78 standard: 57 Tau (HD 27397) - F0IV GrayGarrison89 standards: 57 Tau - F0IV [low vsini standard] HD 27397 - F0IV [low vsini standard] HR 8895A - F0IVn [high vsini standard] Houk88 standard: mu Cet - F0IV [from JM53] GryaNstars standards: 57 Tau - F0IV Gray06 classifies 3 stars as F0IV: HIP 9236, 72197, 84581 For Hipparcos stars within 75pc with parallax S/N > 8 (N=14): (F0IV) = 0.301 (+-0.009 sem, +-0.040 stdev) (F0IV) = 0.339 (+-0.015 sem, +-0.052 stdev) (B-V)(F0IV) = 0.255 ; exemplar HD 95310 = 49 UMa (B-V)(F0IV) = 0.278 ; sec. stan. eps Cep = HD 211336 (B-V)(F0IV) = 0.288 ; pri. stan. 57 Tau = HD 27397 (B-V)(F0IV) = 0.306 ; exemplar HD 107326 = Cl Melotte 111 70 (B-V)(F0IV) = 0.306(+-0.009 sem,+-0.038 stdev) ; SIMBAD median F0IV d<75pc,V<6.5(N=25) (B-V)(F0IV) = 0.347 ; exemplar HD 123255 = HR 5290 (B-V)(F0IV) = 0.360 ; exemplar 23 UMa = HR 3757 => adopt (B-V)(F0IV) = 0.30 [updated 2/2/2022] Mv(F0IV) = -0.19 ; exemplar HD 95310 = 49 UMa Mv(F0IV) = 1.68 ; exemplar HD 123255 = HR 5290 Mv(F0IV) = 1.7 ; GrayCorbally09 Mv(F0IV) = 1.77 ; exemplar 23 UMa = HR 3757 Mv(F0IV) = 2.06 ; exemplar HD 107326 = Cl Melotte 111 70 (Coma Ber cluster) Mv(F0IV) = 2.09 ; sec. stan. eps Cep = HD 211336 (~0.3 mag above MS) Mv(F0IV) = 2.10(+-0.11 sem,+-0.53 stdev) ; SIMBAD median F0IV d<75pc,V<6.5(N=25) Mv(F0IV) = 2.29 ; pri. stan. 57 Tau = HD 27397 (~0.2 mag above MS) Mv(F0IV) = 2.32 ; exemplar HD 143466 = HR 5960 (near MS) # Primary Standard 57 Tau = HD 27397 = HR 1351 = vB 30 = VA 182 = V483 Tau = HIP 20219 (J0419+1402) *F0IV: MK73,Cowley74(stan),MK78,Gray89,GrayGarrison89(low-vsini stan),Gray01 F0V: Morgan65 Hyad, pmRA,pmDec = +116,-19 (TYC2), V=5.58(HIP), vsini=109 km/s. Delta Scuti (Rodriquez94), per=0.054 d (Samus+07). 34" binary. B-V = 0.288+-0.0037 (Joner+06). According to Pinsonneault04 tracks, B-V=0.286 (close to Joner value) corresponds to 1.72 Msun, Teff=7471K, and Mv=2.35. Hence the star's HRD position is consistent with it being on the Hyades ~0.6 Gyr MS. MK78 shows HD 27397 as the F0IV standard (labeled as a Hyades member), and compares it to the F0V standard HD 23585 (Pleiad) and F0III standard Zet Leo. The Pinsonneault Hyades MS runs to 8280K (B-V=0.14; ~A3.5). Most HRD diagrams with luminosity tracks in B-V vs. Mv show the subgiant "IV" track join the upper main sequence around the early Fs. plx=21.9777+-0.0621mas(GaiaEDR3) => Mv=2.29, 0.19 mag above MS. # Secondary Standard eps Cep = HD 211336 = HR 8494 = HIP 109857 F0IV: JM53,Jaschek64(most),Barry70,Cowley74(stan),Ortega83,Abt95 F0V: MK43 F0V Sr II: Gray01 F0: Cannon A9IV: GrayGarrison89 B-V = 0.278, Mv=2.09, dMv= -0.33, so only slightly above MS. GrayGarrison89 called "A9IV", but Gray01 called it "F0V Sr II". Virtually everyone agrees on "F0" subtype. All post-JM53 consider it "IV". Probably an acceptable secondary standard "F0IV" a la JM53. # Deprecated Standard del Aql = HR 7377 = HD 182640 F0IV: Slettebak55,MorganAbt72(stan),Cowley74 F0: Bidelman85 *F1IV-V(n): Gray01 F2IV-V: GrayGarrison89 F2III: Cucchiaro78 A9III: Abt95 Ap: Smith71 mu Cet = HD 17094 = HR 813 (J0244+1006) F0IV: JM53,Jaschek64(all),Cowley74(stan),Cannon(F0) F1III-IV: Malorada75 F0III-IV: Abt95 *F0mF2V+: GrayGarrison89(note) F1IVb: Barry70 A9IIIp: Gray03("some metals = F1") SB. Apparently composite. Gray/Garrison do not agree with JM53. GrayGarrison89 do not list it as a standard, and in the notes comment: "Probable composite spectrum. Close visual double with delta(V)=1.4 and sep=0".1." # Exemplars HD 95310 = 49 UMa = HR 4288 = HIP 53838 F0V: 1925sdsl.book.....L, Slettebak59(F0),Cowley79(F0Vs),Sato90,Abt95 *F0IV: Cowley76 F0III: Bertaud67 A7Vs: Adams35 Decent agreement on F0-subtype, and mostly on dwarf lum class, but seems to be somewhat evolved - so may not be best choice of exemplar- so I've adopted the Cowley76 F0IV. WDS lists binary sep=0.4" and del(mag)=3.7 (mag1=5.10, mag2=8.80). V=5.06(HIP), V=5.078+-0.008(Mermilliod91), plx=8.09+-0.66(HIP), plx=8.9314+-0.2104 mas (GaiaDR2). Probably reddened. B-V=0.255+-0.010(HIP), V-I=0.30+-0.03. WDS lists as 0.4" binary, del(mag) = 3.7. PASTEL: Teff=7074K(Adamczak14), [Fe/H]=0.11(Adamczak14), logg=3.46(Adamczak14). TIC9/Stassun19 & Anders18/StarHorse both list logg ~ 3. E(B-V) = 0.006(Kervella19,STILISM) => Av = 0.020. Mv = -0.19+-0.05. 23 UMa = HR 3757 = HD 81937 = HIP 46733 F0III:: 1919AnHar..94.....C,Cucchiaro80 F0III-IV: Cowley76 *F0IV: Slettebak55,GarrisonGray89 F0V: Chalonge52,Abt95 F0: Keenan41 Great agreement on F0 subtype, but lum class all over the place. Several other F0 classifications, mostly IV and III. V=3.65(HIP), B-V=0.360+-0.015(HIP), V-I=0.41+-0.03(HIP). plx=41.99+-0.16mas(HIP2) => Mv=1.77, 1.13 mag above the MS. HD 107326 = Cl Melotte 111 70 = HR 4694 = HIP 60168 A8: Stock52 A8V: Wilson50 A9V: Palmer68 F0: 1938LicOB..18..167T,1953UppAn...3j...1W,1959AAHam...5..105S F0V: Abt95,1963BOTT....3..137M *F0IV: Cowley69,GrayGarrison89,Gray01 F0III-IV: Apenzeller67 F0II: Duflot56 F0/2IV/Vp: Clausen79 Coma Ber cluster member. vsini=130km/s(Glebocki05). V=6.16(HIP), B-V=0.306+-0.008(HIP), V-I=0.31+-0.03(HIP). plx=15.1579+-0.037mas(GaiaEDR3) => Mv=2.06, 0.51 mag above MS. HD 123255 = HR 5290 = HIP 68940 A8V: Adams35 *F0IV: Abt95,GrayGarrison89(F0IV(Cr)) F2III: Harlan74 F2IV: Cowley74 V=5.46(HIP), B-V=0.347+-0.005(HIP), V-I=0.41+-0.02(HIP). plx=17.5627+-0.0994mas(GaiaEDR3) => Mv=1.68, 1.14 mag above MS. HD 208450 = del Ind = HR 8368 A8(V)+F3(V): Beavers80 F0III: Cucchiaro78 F0III-IVn: GrayGarrison89 *F0IV: deVaucouleurs57,Evans64,Malaroda75,Houk75,Abt95 F0V: 1937AnHar.105...45H, 1955MmMtS..12....1W 0.1" binary in HIP/CCDM, Hp(A)=4.799, Hp(B)=5.959 => delta(Hp)=1.16. V(AB)=4.40(HIP), B-V=0.297+-0.013(HIP), V-I=0.35+-0.02(HIP). Adopting del(V) = 1.16 from del(Hp) & V=4.40 => V(A)=4.72, V(B)=5.88. plx=17.34+-0.48mas(HIP2) => Mv(A)=0.92, Mv(B)=2.08. # Other Stars alf Hyi = HD 12311 = HR 591 A7n: 1932PLicO..18....1M A9III: 1957MNRAS.117..449D F0III-IVn: GrayGarrison89 *F0IV: Abt95,Gray06 F0V: 1937AnHar.105...45H,Woods55,Houk75(Garrison) Several F0 classifications, recently IV. 51 Eri = HR 1474 A7V: Maury1897 *F0IV: GarrisonGray89,Abt95 F0V: Cowley69 F2IV: Davis67 Famous host star to directly imaged young planet 51 Eri b. Beta Pic MG member so ~20 Myr. Two distant M dwarf companions GJ 3305. HD 905 = HR 41 = HIP 1086 F0IV: Cowley69, Abt95(F0IVs) A7: 1932PLicO..18....1M HD 37788 = HR 1955 = HIP 26762 A7V: Palmer68 F0V+: GrayGarrison89 *F0IVs: Abt95 F0IV: Cowley69 HD 55892 = HR 2740 F0IV: Malaroda75,Houk78,GrayGarrison89(G0IVs) F1V: 1937AnHar.105...45H F2III: Cucchiaro78 F3V_Fe-1.0: Gray06 HD 69682 = HR 3258 = HIP 40878 *F0V: Cowley74 F0IV: Cowley65,Abt95 F0III: Grenier99 Fm delta Del: 1966VA......8...53B HRD suggests this is really a main sequence star. V=6.50(HIP), B-V=0.300+-0.007(HIP), V-I=0.34+-0.01(HIP). plx=16.5406+-0.0268mas(GaiaEDR3) => Mv=2.59 (0.05 mag below MS). HD 143466 = HR 5960 = HIP 78180 *F0IV: Slettebak55,Cowley69,GrayGarrison89 F0V: Abt95 F1IVab: Barry70(uv metals weak) Mostly classified as subgiant but HRD position seems like middle of main sequence. V=4.96(HIP), B-V=0.269+-0.008(HIP), V-I=0.29+-0.03(HIP) plx=29.6204+-0.0809mas(GaiaEDR3) => Mv=2.32 => 0.05 mag above MS. HD 163929 F0V: Sato90 *F0IV: Cowley74,Grenier99 F2III: Cowley79 del Ser B = HD 138917 F0V: Adams35 F0IV-V: Slettebak63 F0IV: Abt95 F0IIIb: GrayGarrison89 F0: 1923LicOB..10..169L Great agreement on subtype, awful agreement on luminosity class. # COMMENTS ON COLORS OF F SUBGIANTS Using the Hipparcos catalog, I selected 127 F subgiants which had d<75 pc and plx S/N>8. No stars with slash or dashed types were included. For these 127 F subgiants, the B-V colors were compared to the mean B-V colors for F dwarfs of the same temperature type. I find: <(B-V)FIV> - <(B-V)FV> = 0.000 +- 0.004 (stdev = 0.038 mag; N=127). Hence, for a given subtype, F subgiants have the same mean color as F dwarfs of the same temperature type (to <0.01 mag). For the individual subtypes: <(B-V)F0IV> - <(B-V)F0V> = 0.012+-0.008 (stdev = 0.047 mag; N=32) <(B-V)F1IV> - <(B-V)F1V> = 0.026+-0.014 (stdev = 0.030 mag; N=6) <(B-V)F2IV> - <(B-V)F2V> = -0.005+-0.006 (stdev = 0.025 mag; N=16) <(B-V)F3IV> - <(B-V)F3V> = 0.002+-0.010 (stdev = 0.038 mag; N=14) <(B-V)F4IV> - <(B-V)F4V> = 0.017+-0.027 (stdev = 0.046 mag; N=14) <(B-V)F5IV> - <(B-V)F5V> = -0.015+-0.013 (stdev = 0.034 mag; N=20) <(B-V)F6IV> - <(B-V)F6V> = -0.015+-0.009 (stdev = 0.035 mag; N=19) <(B-V)F7IV> - <(B-V)F7V> = -0.007+-0.021 (stdev = 0.051 mag; N=7) <(B-V)F8IV> - <(B-V)F8V> = 0.006+-0.011 (stdev = 0.028 mag; N=10) #B-V SpT (B-V)_V (B-V)-(B-V)_V 0.331 F0 0.294 0.037 0.259 F0 0.294 -0.035 0.349 F0 0.294 0.055 0.347 F0 0.294 0.053 0.325 F0 0.294 0.031 0.483 F0 0.294 0.189 0.401 F0 0.294 0.107 0.322 F0 0.294 0.028 0.311 F0 0.294 0.017 0.375 F0 0.294 0.081 0.324 F0 0.294 0.03 0.320 F0 0.294 0.026 0.300 F0 0.294 0.006 0.209 F0 0.294 -0.085 0.244 F0 0.294 -0.05 0.306 F0 0.294 0.012 0.309 F0 0.294 0.015 0.277 F0 0.294 -0.017 0.241 F0 0.294 -0.053 0.352 F0 0.294 0.058 0.269 F0 0.294 -0.025 0.289 F0 0.294 -0.005 0.273 F0 0.294 -0.021 0.326 F0 0.294 0.032 0.216 F0 0.294 -0.078 0.229 F0 0.294 -0.065 0.316 F0 0.294 0.022 0.319 F0 0.294 0.025 0.308 F0 0.294 0.014 0.357 F0 0.294 0.063 0.278 F0 0.294 -0.016 0.300 F0 0.294 0.006 0.338 F1 0.334 0.004 0.381 F1 0.334 0.047 0.361 F1 0.334 0.027 0.361 F1 0.334 0.027 0.393 F1 0.334 0.059 0.314 F1 0.334 -0.02 0.386 F2 0.374 0.012 0.307 F2 0.374 -0.067 0.395 F2 0.374 0.021 0.345 F2 0.374 -0.029 0.466 F2 0.374 0.092 0.358 F2 0.374 -0.016 0.369 F2 0.374 -0.005 0.371 F2 0.374 -0.003 0.375 F2 0.374 0.001 0.369 F2 0.374 -0.005 0.363 F2 0.374 -0.011 0.406 F2 0.374 0.032 0.376 F2 0.374 0.002 0.391 F2 0.374 0.017 0.336 F2 0.374 -0.038 0.344 F2 0.374 -0.03 0.292 F3 0.389 -0.097 0.332 F3 0.389 -0.057 0.402 F3 0.389 0.013 0.345 F3 0.389 -0.044 0.377 F3 0.389 -0.012 0.440 F3 0.389 0.051 0.415 F3 0.389 0.026 0.415 F3 0.389 0.026 0.429 F3 0.389 0.04 0.412 F3 0.389 0.023 0.386 F3 0.389 -0.003 0.378 F3 0.389 -0.011 0.394 F3 0.389 0.005 0.386 F3 0.389 -0.003 0.428 F4 0.412 0.016 0.383 F4 0.412 -0.029 0.475 F4 0.412 0.063 0.453 F5 0.438 0.015 0.398 F5 0.438 -0.04 0.421 F5 0.438 -0.017 0.415 F5 0.438 -0.023 0.425 F5 0.438 -0.013 0.393 F5 0.438 -0.045 0.401 F5 0.438 -0.037 0.384 F5 0.438 -0.054 0.461 F5 0.438 0.023 0.438 F5 0.438 0 0.385 F5 0.438 -0.053 0.401 F5 0.438 -0.037 0.443 F5 0.438 0.005 0.442 F5 0.438 0.004 0.394 F5 0.438 -0.044 0.474 F5 0.438 0.036 0.459 F5 0.438 0.021 0.450 F5 0.438 0.012 0.378 F5 0.438 -0.06 0.450 F5 0.438 0.012 0.470 F6 0.484 -0.014 0.555 F6 0.484 0.071 0.412 F6 0.484 -0.072 0.497 F6 0.484 0.013 0.452 F6 0.484 -0.032 0.471 F6 0.484 -0.013 0.454 F6 0.484 -0.03 0.444 F6 0.484 -0.04 0.480 F6 0.484 -0.004 0.455 F6 0.484 -0.029 0.449 F6 0.484 -0.035 0.526 F6 0.484 0.042 0.505 F6 0.484 0.021 0.458 F6 0.484 -0.026 0.414 F6 0.484 -0.07 0.443 F6 0.484 -0.041 0.490 F6 0.484 0.006 0.529 F6 0.484 0.045 0.465 F6 0.484 -0.019 0.576 F7 0.510 0.066 0.571 F7 0.510 0.061 0.510 F7 0.510 0 0.478 F7 0.510 -0.032 0.489 F7 0.510 -0.021 0.476 F7 0.510 -0.034 0.487 F7 0.510 -0.023 0.504 F8 0.530 -0.026 0.537 F8 0.530 0.007 0.554 F8 0.530 0.024 0.570 F8 0.530 0.04 0.523 F8 0.530 -0.007 0.553 F8 0.530 0.023 0.513 F8 0.530 -0.017 0.529 F8 0.530 -0.001 0.517 F8 0.530 -0.013 0.572 F8 0.530 0.042