G0V HD109358 is the G0V dagger type (Garrison94) MK43 lists Xi UMa as the G0V standard. Unfortunately it is a 1" binary, which Keenan89 split into a F8.5:V + G2V binary. Is this the reason the differences in the late-F/early-G classifications among later authors? Morgan65 lists Bet CVn (HD 109358) as its G0V standard, and classified two Hyads as G0V: HD 27406 & 27691. Morgan71 and Garrison72 list Bet Com (HD 114710) as its G0V standard MorganAbt73 and Cowley76 list Bet Com & Eta Cas A as their G0V standards. Corbally86 used the Hyad HD 27406 (vB 31) as their G0V standard. HD 2151 (Bet Hyi) was a G0 standard for the HD catalog (1918AnHar..91.....C) Mean color of Hipparcos G0V stars w/i 75 pc is 0.588 Mean color of Hipparcos G0IV stars w/i 75 pc is 0.586 (N=20) Mean color of Hipparcos G0III stars w/i 75 pc is 0.591 (N=6) Gray01/03/06 list 81 nearby G0V stars. Their median HIP colors are: (G0V) = 0.599 (+-0.001 sem, +-0.018 stdev; N=81) (G0V) = 0.669 (+-0.001 sem, +-0.024 stdev; N=81) # No standard Houk does not list a G0V standard # Dagger standards HD 109358 = bet CVn = HR 4785 = GJ 475 G0V: MKK43,JM53,Morgan65,Garrison72(stan),MK73,Jaschek78,Keenan85,Keenan88,Garrison94,Gray01,Gray03,GrayNstars G1V: MorganAbt73 B-V(HIP)=0.588+-0.009, whereas B-V(G0V,HIP)=0.585 so its B-V color is very representative for its color # Other standards HD 14802 = kap For = HR 695 = GJ 97 G0V: Gray89,Keenan89,Keenan99 G1V: Jaschek78(Buscombe62),Torres06 G2V: Houk88 F5: Cannon Torres06 says SB? HD 39587 = chi01 Ori = HR 2047 G0V: MK43,Roman52,Slettebak55,Keenan89,Keenan99 G0IV-V: Gray03(G band slightly weak) G0-V Ca0.5: Keenan88 G1V: Cowley76,Levato78 F8V: Moore50 "Chi02 Ori" is a V=4.6 B2 supergiant! Keenan89 and Keenan88 differ slightly(?) HD 95128 = 47 UMa = HR 4277 G0V: MK43,Keenan88 # Weak standards HD 4614A = eta Cas A = HR 219A = HIP 3821 = GJ 34A F9V: Keenan88,Keenan89,Hoffleit91,Keenan99,Gray01,GrayNstars,Abt08 G0V: MK43,JM53,MorganAbt73,Cowley76(stan),MK78,Abt81,Keenan85,Barry70(G0Vb),Moore50,GrayAtlas,Garrison96 B-V(HIP)=0.587, Vmag=3.46, Mv=4.59, dMv=+0.20, par=168.0+-0.4 mas Spectroscopic binary; not in Houk Probably inappropriate as standard as G0V only ~1940s-80s Gray calls it G0V in his atlas, but F9V in his 2001 catalog It appears G0V is where "MK" had an "M" version and a "K" version? HD 141004 = lam Ser = HR 5868 = GJ 598 G0V : MK73(non-standard) G0V- : Keenan88 G2V: MK43 HD 114710 = bet Com = HR 4983 = GJ 502 G0V : MK43,JM53,Morgan71,MK73,Cowley76(stan),GrayAtlas G2V : Houk(changed,but she doesn't recommend use as a standard) Appears to be a common G0V standard among Morgan,Keenan,& Gray, but not Houk del Tri G0V: MK43 iot Per G0V: MK43 HD 27406 = Cl Melotte 25 31 = V986 Tau = HIP 20237 G0V: Corbally86(stan,Morgan65)