G6V Garrison94 does not list a G6V anchor standard, and MK73 does not list a G6V dagger standard. Keenan84 does not list G6 as a full subtype like G5 and G8, and "other possible subdivisions are utilized only for interpolation whenever we think that we can classify accurately enough to justify their use. Thus when we call a star G3 we mean only that it is closer to G2 than to G5." HD 20794 (82 Eri) is the only G6V standard, but only Keenan has ever listed it as G6V. Unfortunately Gray06 classified it as G8V. Keenan99 standard: 82 Eri (HD 20794) - G6V Strassmeier90 stan: 61 Vir (HR 5019) - G6V (B-V)(G6V) = 0.724 ; non-stan. HD 105913 (B-V)(G6V) = 0.72 ; Fitzgerald70 (B-V)(G6V) = 0.716 ; non-stan. HD 18803 (B-V)(G6V) = 0.715 ; median SIMBAD G6V d<25pc (N=7) (G6V) = 0.712 (+-0.003 sem, +-0.034 stdev; HIP d<75pc S/N>8 N=141) (B-V)(G6V) = 0.711 ; deprecated stan. 82 Eri (B-V)(G6V) = 0.71 ; exemplar HD 28255B (B-V)(G6V) = 0.71 ; Strassmeier90 (G6V) = 0.70 ; Bessell79 (B-V)(G6V) = 0.700 ; exemplar HD 54371 (B-V)(G6V) = 0.697 (+-0.014 sem, +-0.045 stdev; med. 12 ARICNS G6V stars (B-V)(G6V) = 0.696 ; interp G5V(B-V=0.68),G8V(B-V=0.73) (G6V) = 0.693 (+-0.005 sem, +-0.024 stdev; Gray01/03/06 N=22) (B-V)(G6V) = 0.692 ; exemplar HD 171067 (solar metallicity) (B-V)(G6V) = 0.68 ; median CATSUP d<30pc (N=11) (B-V)(G6V) = 0.68 ; KenyonHartmann95 (B-V)(G6V) = 0.659 ; exemplar HD 216777 => adopt (B-V)(G6V) = 0.700 *** [last updated 8/29/2019] => adopt (U-B)(G6V) = 0.227 => adopt (V-I)(G6V) = 0.758 => adopt (V-R)(G6V) = 0.388 => adopt (R-I)(G6V) = 0.370 => adopt (V-J)(G6V) = 1.289 => adopt (V-H)(G6V) = 1.612 => adopt (V-Ks)(G6V) = 1.691 => adopt (H-Ks)(G6V) = 0.079 => adopt (J-H)(G6V) = 0.324 (V-Ks)(G6V) = 1.660 +- 0.043 ; B-V vs. V-Ks for XHIP d<50pc G dwarfs (-0.1<[Fe/H]<0.1) for B-V=0.700 (Ks-W1)(G6V) = 0.063 ; EEM trend for d<30pc for B-V=0.70 => adopt (Ks-W1)(G6V) = 0.063 [updated 12/29/2019] (G-V)(G6V) = -0.204 ; * e Eri G6V (G-V)(G6V) = -0.193 ; HD 128400 PM* G6V (G-V)(G6V) = -0.188 ; HD 102438 PM* G6V (G-V)(G6V) = -0.188 ; HD 70642 PM* G6VCN+0.5 (G-V)(G6V) = -0.186 ; HD 177565 PM* G6V (G-V)(G6V) = -0.186 ; G dwarf trend for G6V (G-V)(G6V) = -0.176 ; HD 4308 PM* G6VFe-0.9 (G-V)(G6V) = -0.175 ; HD 117043 PM* G6V (G-V)(G6V) = -0.169 ; HD 171067 PM* G6V (G-V)(G6V) = -0.154 ; HD 201989 PM* G6V => adopt (G-V)(G6V) = -0.186 [updated 11/1/2020] (Bp-Rp)(G6V) = 0.8386 ; HD_216777 (Bp-Rp)(G6V) = 0.8552 ; HD_28255_B (Bp-Rp)(G6V) = 0.8568 ; HD_171067 (Bp-Rp)(G6V) = 0.86 ; Bp-G=0.38, G-Rp=0.38 (Bp-Rp)(G6V) = 0.8631 ; HD_18803 (Bp-Rp)(G6V) = 0.875 ; color trend for B-V=0.70 (Bp-Rp)(G6V) = 0.8987 ; HD_54371 (Bp-Rp)(G6V) = 0.9169 ; 82_Eri (Bp-Rp)(G6V) = 0.922 ; Evans18 trend for V-I=0.758 => adopt (Bp-Rp)(G6V) = 0.86 [updated 11/15/2020] (Bp-G)(G6V) = 0.3595 ; HD_216777 (Bp-G)(G6V) = 0.364 ; color trend for B-V=0.70 (Bp-G)(G6V) = 0.3715 ; HD_171067 (Bp-G)(G6V) = 0.3763 ; HD_28255_B (Bp-G)(G6V) = 0.3765 ; HD_18803 (Bp-G)(G6V) = 0.38 ; Bp-Rp=0.86, G-Rp=0.48 (Bp-G)(G6V) = 0.3945 ; HD_54371 (Bp-G)(G6V) = 0.4886 ; 82_Eri => adopt (Bp-G)(G6V) = 0.38 [updated 11/15/2020] (G-Rp)(G6V) = 0.3894 ; HD_216777 (G-Rp)(G6V) = 0.4283 ; 82_Eri (G-Rp)(G6V) = 0.4435 ; HD_28255_B (G-Rp)(G6V) = 0.4789 ; HD_28255_B (G-Rp)(G6V) = 0.4791 ; HD_216777 (G-Rp)(G6V) = 0.48 ; Bp-Rp=0.86, Bp-G=0.38 (G-Rp)(G6V) = 0.4854 ; HD_171067 (G-Rp)(G6V) = 0.4866 ; HD_18803 (G-Rp)(G6V) = 0.5042 ; HD_54371 (G-Rp)(G6V) = 0.511 ; color trend for B-V=0.70 => adopt (G-Rp)(G6V) = 0.48 [updated 11/15/2020] (G6V) = 0.748 (+-0.005 sem, +-0.023 stdev; Gray01/03/06 N=22) (G6V) = 0.760 ; Bessell79 (G6V) = 0.763 (+-0.004 sem, +-0.026 stdev; HIP d<75pc S/N>8 N=141) (G6V) = 0.364 ; Bessell79 (G6V) = 1.285 (+-0.005 sem, +-0.054 stdev; HIP d<75pc S/N>8 N=141) (G6V) = 1.617 (+-0.007 sem, +-0.072 stdev; HIP d<75pc S/N>8 N=141) (G6V) = 1.709 (+-0.008 sem, +-0.076 stdev; HIP d<75pc S/N>8 N=141) (G6V) = 0.332 (+-0.003 sem, +-0.038 stdev; HIP d<75pc S/N>8 N=141) (G6V) = 0.094 (+-0.003 sem, +-0.028 stdev; HIP d<75pc S/N>8 N=141) (G6V) = 0.804 (+-0.004 sem, +-0.053 stdev; HIP d<75pc S/N>8 N=141) (G6V) =-0.077 (+-0.002 sem, +-0.018 stdev; HIP d<75pc S/N>8 N=141) (G6V) = 2.423 (+-0.010 sem, +-0.098 stdev; HIP d<75pc S/N>8 N=141) (U-B)(G6V) = 0.180 ; HIP d<75pc S/N>8 G6V N=21 (Mermilliod91 photometry) (g-r)(G6V) = 0.514 ; Jordi06 (V-R)=>(g-r) for V-R=0.388 (g-r)(G6V) = 0.517 ; Covey07 interp G5V-G8V (g-r)(G6V) = 0.535 ; Bilir05 (B-V)=>(g-r) for B-V=0.700 => adopt (g-r)(G6V) = 0.52 [updated 10/10/2020] Teff(G6V) = 5434 K ; deprecated stan. 82 Eri Teff(G6V) = 5476 K ; Boyajian12 Teff(G6V) = 5477 K ; GrayCorbally94 interp. (G5V-G8V) Teff(G6V) = 5500 K ; Bessell79 Teff(G6V) = 5530 K ; GrayCorbally09 interp. (G5V-G8V) Teff(G6V) = 5550 K ; mean photometric Teff Teff(G6V) = 5582 K ; interp for B-V=0.70 from G5V-G8V trend Teff(G6V) = 5586 K ; Teff from smoothed SpT(Teff) trend Teff(G6V) = 5599 K ; Casagrande10 calib for B-V=0.70,[Fe/H]=0,logg=4.4 Teff(G6V) = 5605 K ; Teff for d<30pc [Fe/H]=+-0.1 dex dwarfs from Hinkel17 for B-V=0.70 Teff(G6V) = 5625 K ; median among 339 published Teffs for G6V stars Teff(G6V) = 5627 K ; exemplar HD 216777 Teff(G6V) = 5643 K ; exemplar HD 171067 (solar metallicity) Teff(G6V) = 5646 K ; exemplar HD 54371 Teff(G6V) = 5656 K ; exemplar HD 18803 Teff(G6V) = 5658 K ; exemplar HD 28255B => adopt Teff(G6V) = 5600 K (logT = 3.748) [last updated 8/29/2019] BCv(G6V) = -0.124 mag ; Bertone04(ATLAS,Teff=5600K) BCv(G6V) = -0.120 mag ; EEM fit to Casagrande06/08/10 (Teff=5600K) BCv(G6V) = -0.119 mag ; Flower96(Teff=5600K) BCv(G6V) = -0.116 mag ; Masana06(Teff=5600K) BCv(G3V) = -0.112 mag ; Casagrande18(Teff=5600K,logg=4.5) BCv(G6V) = -0.112 mag ; Bessell98(ATLAS9,logg=4.5,Teff=5600K) => adopt BCv(G6V) = -0.115 mag [last updated 8/29/2019, on scale where BCv(5772K)=-0.085] Mv(G6V) = 5.35 mag ; deprecated stan. 82 Eri Mv(G6V) = 5.3 mag ; GrayCorbally09 Mv(G6V) = 5.23 mag ; median XHIP G6V d<20pc Mv(G6V) = 5.20 mag ; median SIMBAD G6V d<25pc (N=7) Mv(G6V) = 5.18 mag ; exemplar HD 216777 Mv(G6V) = 5.14 mag ; CATSUP -0.1<[Fe/H]<0.1 d<30pc for B-V=0.700 Mv(G6V) = 5.12 mag ; exemplar HD 171067 Mv(G6V) = 5.11 mag ; B-V=0.700 => EEM fit to SIMBAD dwarfs d<25pc Mv(G6V) = 5.10 mag ; B-V=0.700 => Mv(Wright05) Mv(G6V) = 5.09 mag ; Gray01/03/06 dwarfs, xHIP B-V/Mv, Gaspar16 |[Fe/H]|<0.05 "solar": fit for B-V=0.70 Mv(G6V) = 5.09 mag ; exemplar HD 54371 Mv(G6V) = 5.05 mag ; exemplar HD 18803 Mv(G6V) = 4.68 mag ; Wegner07 => adopt Mv(G6V) = 5.10 mag [updated 9/26/2019] => adopt M_G(G6V) = 4.914 mag [updated 12/10/2020] (Mv=5.10, G-V=-0.186) => adopt M_Ks(G6V) = 3.409 mag [updated 12/30/2020] (Mv=5.10, V-Ks=1.691) logL(G6V) = -0.098 dex ; Mv=5.1, BCv=-0.115 => Mbol = 4.985 => adopt logL(G6V) = -0.098 dex [last updated 9/26/2019] => adopt Mbol(G6V) = 4.985 mag [last updated 9/26/2019] Rad(G6V) = 0.949 Rsun ; Teff=5600K, logL=-0.098 => adopt Rad(G6V) = 0.949 Rsun [updated 9/26/2019] Mass(G6V) = 0.969 Msun ; EEM Mv vs. Mass fit for binaries (Mv=5.1) Mass(G6V) = 0.966 Msun ; Eker15 ML calibration for logL=-0.098 Mass(G6V) = 0.964 Msun ; Eker18 ML calibration for logL=-0.098 Mass(G6V) = 0.963 Msun ; EEM logL vs. Mass fit for binaries (logL=-0.098) => adopt Mass(G6V) = 0.97 Msun [updated 10/23/2019] # NO standards JM53, Wilson62, Morgan65, MK73, Houk75, KeenanMcNeil76, Keenan85, Corbally86, GrayNstars do not list a G6V standard # Deprecated Standard HD 20794 = 82 Eri = HR 1008 = GJ 139 = e Eri G5V: 1955MmMtS..12....1W,Evans57,Bidelman85(G5) G6V: 1937AnHar.105...45H,Keenan99(stan) G7V: Adams35 *G8V: Wilson62(SB?),Keenan85(stan),Keenan88(stan),Keenan89(stan),Gray06 G8III: Houk78 Was considered G8V standard by Keenan 1983-1989, but did not appear previously (1980,1983). I'm wondering if the G8V in the final Keenan online catalog is a typo? B-V=0.711+-0.005(HIP). Star is nearby dwarf (Mv=5.35). PASTEL mean parameters: = 5409K (N=21), [Fe/H] = -0.4, logg = 4.48+-0.04. # Exemplars HD 171067 = HIP 90864 (J1832+1344; V=7.2) *G6V: Gray03 G8V: Harlan69 Nearby (<25pc) and well-studied, modern type from Gray, and solar metallicity - but not many published types. V=7.204+-0.013(Mermilliod91), V=7.20(HIP), (B-V)=0.680+-0.018(Mermillid91), B-V=0.692+-0.009(HIP), U-B=0.239(Mermilliod91), J=5.897+-0.024(2MASS), V-Ic=0.75+-0.01(HIP), H=5.626+-0.023(2MASS), Ks=5.557+-0.021(2MASS), V-Ks = 1.647 (Mermilliod91,2MASS). PASTEL: [Fe/H] = -0.03 (N=3), logg = 4.50 (N=3), Teff = 5643K(N=7). plx = 38.2327 +- 0.0387 mas (GaiaDR2). Mv = 5.116 +- 0.013. HD 28255 B = HR 1405 B G5V: Corbally84 *G6V: Eggen64,vanAltena95,Gray06 G7V: Torres06 F:: Houk75 5.5" binary with G1V HD 28255A. VanAltena95 lists V=7.26, B-V=0.71, U-B=0.24, G4V. Only parameters in Valenti05: Teff = 5658K, [Fe/H]=0.09, logg=4.49. HD 216777 = SAO 146393 G1V: Adams35 G5: Cannon *G6V: Jaschek78(Roman55),Jaschek64(all),Eggen65,Bidelman85,Houk99 K0: 1923LicOB..11..127L V=8mag. Has DA8 white dwarf companion at sep=42". V=8.01(HIP), B-V=0.659+-0.003(HIP), Mv=5.18. PASTEL mean parameters: Teff=5627+-18K, [Fe/H]=-0.41+-0.05, logg=4.45+-0.11. HD 54371 = SAO 79121 *G6V: Adams35,Gray03 G5V: Abt85 G8V: Harlan69 PASTEL mean parameters: Teff=5646+-24K, [Fe/H]=+0.06, logg=4.29. V=7.09(HIP), B-V=0.700+-0.015(HIP), Mv=5.09. HD 18803 *G6V: Adams35,Gray03 G8V: Harlan70 WDS lists 3 candidate companions at 7.6", 8.0", 10.4", but all ~20th-22nd magnitude. V=6.616+-0.022(Mermilliod91), B-V=0.716+-0.000(Mermilliod91), U-B=0.305(Mermilliod91), Mv=5.05. PASTEL mean parameters: Teff=5656+-5K, [Fe/H]=0.139+-0.003, logg=4.47+-0.04. # Other Stars HD 105913 G6V: Abt81(unresolved pair) *G6V+G7V: Gray06 4.7" pair of G6V+G7V. Teff: 5550K(Casagrande11). TYC photometry converted to Johnson: B-V=0.724+-0.008. HD 115617 = 61 Vir G6V: Morgan53 *G6.5V: Keenan89 G5V: Roman50,Houk88 G7V: Gray06 Unfortunately Morgan53, Keenan89, Houk88 and Gray06 can't agree on the subtype (somewhere in G5 - G8). Only G6V star mentioned by Morgan53. Skiff08 HD & HR stars with multiple G6V classifications: HD 18803, 54371, 101501, 216777. None have very strong G6V pedigrees to warrant being a candidate standard. Morgan65 classified two Hyads as G6V: HD 27989 & 28099. HD 27989 = BD+18_636 = V1233 Tau G6V: Morgan65 G4V: Wilson53,Christy69 G5V: Adams35,Perraud62,Wilson63(G5) One of two Hyads classified G6V by Morgan65. Unfortunately only Morgan65 classified it "G6V" - all other types are earlier. Tight binary in WDS, with V1=8.09, V2=8.89: Christy69 classified the unresolved binary G4V, but splits the components into G3V+G6V (with delta(V)=0.5). Variable, rotation period = 9.16 days (GCVS).Given the weak pedigree and tight binarity, this does not seem to be a good candidate for G6V standard star. HD 28099 = BD+16_601 = V911 Tau: G6V: Morgan65 G8V: Perraud62 G4V: Adams35 *G2+V: Keenan89("H&K slightly weak") G0V: Ramberg41, Jacoby84 One of two Hyads classified G6V by Morgan65. I should be surprised that Morgan called it G6V and Keenan calls it G2+V, but given the ridiculous inconsistencies that appear in the MK classifications, I am not. For some reason Jacoby84 calls this star a G0V with E(B-V)=0.03, despite it being a member of the Hyades (negligible reddening). And even more inexplicably, Navarro12 adopts the Jacoby84 type for their automated spectral classification. Work. Plenty of published Teffs in Soubiran10 catalog, median Teff = 5793K (so likely ~G2V). The star is a tight binary (0.4"), with mag(A)=6.60, mag(B)=11.47 in the WDS. Rotation period 8.67 days. Could the range in types be due to variability/spottedness? The star is a mess, and probably shouldn't be considered a standard. HD 26913 = V891 Tau (BY Dra system) G2V(e): Li00 G3V: Abt81 G5IV: Stephenson60 *G6V: Gray06 G8V: Slettebak60 Poor agreement in types, probably since its an active spotted star. Montes01 includes it in UMa group. Baliunas96 Mt. Wilson star with = -4.391, rotation period = 7 days, i.e. young and active.