G9V Garrison94 does not list a G9V anchor standard, and MK73 does not list a G9V dagger standard. There are no "good" standards for the G9V subtype. Keenan84 does not list G9 as a full subtype like G8 and K0, and "other possible subdivisions are utilized only for interpolation whenever we think that we can classify accurately enough to justify their use. Thus when we call a star G3 we mean only that it is closer to G2 than to G5." The two Gray et al. G9V stars with identical median B-I colors are HIP 21327 and HIP 29761. I discuss them below. Keenan80 standard: HD 158614 (=HR 6516) - G9-IV-V Hdel1 (B-V)(G9V) = 0.745 ; HD 27250 Hyad (Morgan65) (B-V)(G9V) = 0.755 ; HD 225261 exemplar (B-V)(G9V) = 0.758 ; HD 27732 Hyad (Morgan65) (G9V) = 0.76 ; Fitzgerald70 (B-V)(G9V) = 0.767 ; HD 145958 A exemplar (B-V)(G9V) = 0.768 ; interp G8V(B-V=0.730),K1V(B-V=0.845) (B-V)(G9V) = 0.773 ; HD 82443 exemplar (B-V)(G9V) = 0.775 ; median CATSUP d<30pc G9Vs (N=39) (B-V)(G9V) = 0.775 ; Schmidt-Kaler82(halfway G8V-K0V) (B-V)(G9V) = 0.776 ; HD 4747 exemplar (G9V) = 0.777 (+-0.005 sem, +-0.031 stdev); 77 Gray01/03/06 G9V (B-V)(G9V) = 0.780 ; HD 116442 exemplar (B-V)(G9V) = 0.796 ; HD 195987 exemplar (B-V)(G9V) = 0.799 ; HD 164922 exemplar (B-V)(G9V) = 0.800 ; median SIMBAD G9V d<25pc (N=20) (B-V)(G9V) = 0.804 ; HD 116956 exemplar (B-V)(G9V) = 0.810 ; HD 191499 exemplar (G9V) = 0.818 (+-0.027 sem, +-0.092 stdev); 14 HIP d<75 pc G9V stars (B-V)(G9V) = 0.836 (+-0.036 sem, +-0.072 stdev); 7 ARICNS3 G9V stars => adopt (B-V)(G9V) = 0.775 *** [updated 8/29/2019] => adopt (U-B)(G9V) = 0.354 => adopt (V-I)(G9V) = 0.821 => adopt (V-R)(G9V) = 0.424 => adopt (R-I)(G9V) = 0.397 => adopt (V-J)(G9V) = 1.406 => adopt (V-H)(G9V) = 1.770 => adopt (V-Ks)(G9V) = 1.857 => adopt (H-Ks)(G9V) = 0.087 => adopt (J-H)(G9V) = 0.364 => adopt (V-Hp)(G9V) = -0.143 => adopt (W1-W2)(G9V)= -0.060 => adopt (W1-W3)(G9V)= -0.038 => adopt (W1-W4)(G9V)= -0.018 [last updated 8/25/2017] (V-Ks)(G9V) = 1.821 +- 0.043 ; B-V vs. V-Ks for XHIP d<50pc G dwarfs (-0.1<[Fe/H]<0.1) for B-V=0.775 In the Gray01/03/06 catalogs, there are 77 nearby G9V stars. Median HIP colors: (G9V) = 0.777 (+-0.005 sem, +-0.031 stdev; N=77) (G9V) = 0.821 (+-0.007 sem, +-0.030 stdev; N=77) For G9V Hipparcos stars within 75pc, with parallax S/N > 8, and within 1 mag of the MS (N=14): (G9V) = 0.818 (+-0.027 sem, +-0.092 stdev; N=14) (G9V) = 0.862 (+-0.023 sem, +-0.076 stdev; N=14) (G9V) = 1.515 (+-0.065 sem, +-0.172 stdev; N=14) (G9V) = 1.923 (+-0.068 sem, +-0.236 stdev; N=14) (G9V) = 2.025 (+-0.082 sem, +-0.235 stdev; N=14) (G9V) = 0.404 (+-0.014 sem, +-0.066 stdev; N=14) (G9V) = 0.092 (+-0.009 sem, +-0.026 stdev; N=14) (G9V) = 0.947 (+-0.035 sem, +-0.129 stdev; N=14) (G9V) =-0.085 (+-0.006 sem, +-0.027 stdev; N=14) (G9V) = 2.839 (+-0.104 sem, +-0.328 stdev; N=14) (G-V)(G9V) = -0.232 ; * 49 Ser G9V (G-V)(G9V) = -0.225 ; HD 116442 PM* G9V (G-V)(G9V) = -0.220 ; * 41 Ara G9V (G-V)(G9V) = -0.210 ; HD 205536 PM* G9V (G-V)(G9V) = -0.210 ; G dwarf trend for G9V (G-V)(G9V) = -0.208 ; HD 159062 PM* G9V_Fe-0.8 (G-V)(G9V) = -0.207 ; HD 12051 PM* G9V (G-V)(G9V) = -0.207 ; smoothed fit for f(SpT) (G-V)(G9V) = -0.205 ; polynomial fit for f(B-V) (G-V)(G9V) = -0.204 ; HD 164922 PM* G9V (G-V)(G9V) = -0.198 ; HD 53143 PM* G9V (G-V)(G9V) = -0.180 ; HD 136923 PM* G9V (G-V)(G9V) = -0.180 ; HD 139813 PM* G9V => adopt (G-V)(G9V) = -0.210 [updated 11/1/2020] (Ks-W1)(G9V) = 0.067 ; EEM trend for d<30pc for B-V=0.775 => adopt (Ks-W1)(G9V) = 0.067 [updated 12/29/2019] (Bp-Rp)(G9V) = 0.9244 ; HD_145958_A (Bp-Rp)(G9V) = 0.9437 ; HD_135204 (Bp-Rp)(G9V) = 0.95 ; Bp-G=0.42, G-Rp=0.53 (Bp-Rp)(G9V) = 0.950 ; color trend for B-V=0.775 (Bp-Rp)(G9V) = 0.9543 ; HD_156274 (Bp-Rp)(G9V) = 0.9582 ; HD_4747 (Bp-Rp)(G9V) = 0.9848 ; HD_82443 => adopt (Bp-Rp)(G9V) = 0.95 [updated 11/15/2020] (Bp-G)(G9V) = 0.4017 ; HD_145958_A (Bp-G)(G9V) = 0.404 ; color trend for B-V=0.775 (Bp-G)(G9V) = 0.4165 ; HD_135204 (Bp-G)(G9V) = 0.42 ; Bp-Rp=0.95, G-Rp=0.53 (Bp-G)(G9V) = 0.4205 ; HD_4747 (Bp-G)(G9V) = 0.4406 ; HD_82443 (Bp-G)(G9V) = 0.4527 ; HD_156274 => adopt (Bp-G)(G9V) = 0.42 [updated 11/15/2020] (G-Rp)(G9V) = 0.5016 ; HD_156274 (G-Rp)(G9V) = 0.5227 ; HD_145958_A (G-Rp)(G9V) = 0.5273 ; HD_135204 (G-Rp)(G9V) = 0.53 ; Bp-Rp=0.95, Bp-G=0.42 (G-Rp)(G9V) = 0.5377 ; HD_4747 (G-Rp)(G9V) = 0.5441 ; HD_82443 (G-Rp)(G9V) = 0.545 ; color trend for B-V=0.775 => adopt (G-Rp)(G9V) = 0.53 [updated 11/15/2020] (U-B)(G9V) = 0.379 ; HIP d<75pc S/N>8 G9V N=14 (Mermilliod91 photometry) (g-r)(G9V) = 0.572 ; Jordi06 (V-R)=>(g-r) for V-R=0.424 (g-r)(G9V) = 0.595 ; Covey07 interp G8V-K0V (g-r)(G9V) = 0.619 ; Bilir05 (B-V)=>(g-r) for B-V=0.775 => adopt (g-r)(G9V) = 0.60 [updated 10/10/2020] Teff(G9V) = 5280 K ; Ramirez05 Teff calibration for B-V=0.777 Teff(G9V) = 5300 K ; exemplar HD 82443 Teff(G9V) = 5323 K ; Napiwotzki93 Teff calibration for B-V=0.777 Teff(G9V) = 5335 K ; median Teff for 163 published Teffs for G9V stars (EEM) Teff(G9V) = 5340 K ; mean photometric Teff (checked 8/25/2017) Teff(G9V) = 5350 K ; GrayCorbally09 Teff(G9V) = 5364 +- 21 K ; Pecaut13 (GJ 764) Teff(G9V) = 5365 K ; GrayCorbally94 halfway between G8V and K0V Teff(G9V) = 5382 K ; Casagrande10 Teff calibration for B-V=0.777 Teff(G9V) = 5387 K ; Teff for d<30pc [Fe/H]=+-0.1 dex dwarfs from Hinkel17 for B-V=0.775 Teff(G9V) = 5390 K ; exemplar HD 4747 Teff(G9V) = 5393 K ; halfway between G8V and K0V median Teffs Teff(G9V) = 5395 K ; Pecaut13 (GJ 75) Teff(G9V) = 5405 K ; Teff from smoothed SpT(Teff) trend Teff(G9V) = 5410 K ; Schmidt-Kaler82 halfway between G8V-K0V Teff(G9V) = 5413 K ; exemplar HD 135204 Teff(G9V) = 5414 K ; Boyajian12 Teff(G9V) = 5426 K ; Biazzo07 Teff calibration for B-V=0.777 => adopt Teff(G9V) = 5380 K (logT = 3.731) [updated 8/29/2019] BCv(G9V) = -0.181 mag ; EEM fit to Casagrande06/08/10 (Teff=5380K) BCv(G9V) = -0.174 mag ; Flower96(Teff=5380K) BCv(G9V) = -0.168 mag ; Masana06(Teff=5380K) BCv(G9V) = -0.161 mag ; Bessell98(ATLAS9,logg=4.5,Teff=5380K) BCv(G9V) = -0.160 mag ; Bertone04(Teff=5380K,ATLAS) BCv(G9V) = -0.159 mag ; Casagrande18(Teff=5380K,logg=4.5) => adopt BCv(G9V) = -0.160 mag [last updated 8/29/2019, on scale where BCv(5772K)=-0.085] Mv(G9V) = 6.17 mag ; exemplar HD 135204 A & B Mv(G9V) = 5.83 mag ; exemplar HR 6416 A = HD 156274 Mv(G9V) = 5.79 mag ; exemplar HD 4747 Mv(G9V) = 5.79 mag ; median XHIP G9V d<20pc Mv(G9V) = 5.72 mag ; exemplar HD 82443 Mv(G9V) = 5.7 mag ; GrayCorbally09 Mv(G9V) = 5.7 mag ; Schmidt-Kaler82(halfway G8V-K0V) Mv(G9V) = 5.59 mag ; B-V=0.775 => CATSUP trend for d<30pc dwarfs Mv(G9V) = 5.54 mag ; CATSUP -0.1<[Fe/H]<0.1 d<30pc for B-V=0.775 Mv(G9V) = 5.53 mag ; B-V=0.775 => Mv(Wright05) Mv(G9V) = 5.51 mag ; Gray01/03/06 dwarfs, xHIP B-V/Mv, Gaspar16 |[Fe/H]|<0.05 "solar": fit for B-V=0.775 Mv(G9V) = 5.51 mag ; B-V=0.775 => EEM fit to SIMBAD dwarfs d<25pc Mv(G9V) = 5.51 mag ; median SIMBAD G9V d<25pc (N=20) Mv(G9V) = 5.14 mag ; Wegner07 => adopt Mv(G9V) = 5.55 mag [updated 9/26/2019] => adopt M_G(G9V) = 5.34 mag [updated 12/10/2020] (Mv=5.55, G-V=-0.21) => adopt M_Ks(G9V) = 3.693 mag [updated 12/30/2020] (Mv=5.55, V-Ks=1.857) logL(G9V) = -0.260 dex ; Mv=5.55, BCv=-0.160 => Mbol = 5.390 => adopt logL(G9V) = -0.260 dex [updated 9/26/2019] => adopt Mbol(G9V) = 5.390 mag [updated 9/26/2019] Rad(G9V) = 0.853 Rsun ; Teff=5380K, logL=-0.26 => adopt Rad(G9V) = 0.853 Rsun [updated 8/29/2019] Mass(G9V) = 0.912 Msun ; EEM Mv vs. Mass fit for binaries (Mv=5.55) Mass(G9V) = 0.904 Msun ; Eker18 calibration for logL=-0.260 Mass(G9V) = 0.895 Msun ; Eker15 calibration for logL=-0.260 Mass(G9V) = 0.893 Msun ; EEM logL vs. Mass fit for binaries (logL=-0.260) => adopt Mass(G9V) = 0.90 Msun [updated 10/23/2019] # No standards Houk does not treat G9 as a full type (mislisted as "F9" in their intro), does not list a G9V standard, and in their 5 volumes there is *1* G9 star (G9.5IIIb; HD 146791) Keenan89 lists HD 18907 = Eps For as "G9:V", but no explicit "G9V" standards JM53, Wilson62, Morgan65, Houk75, KeenanMcNeil76, Keenan85, Corbally86, and GrayNstars do not have a G9V standard. Skiff08 did not flag any stars as G9V MK standards. # Deprecated Standards HD 18907: G9:V: Keenan89,Keenan99 *K2V Fe-1.3CH-0.8: Gray06 G5IV: Jaschek64,Jaschek78,Kennedy83 This is a metal poor star [Fe/H] ~ -0.7 (see Cayrel 2001 refs) This star appears to be inappropriate for use as a standard for pop I stars. # Exemplars HD 82443 = DX Leo = GJ 354.1 A = GJ 9301 A = HIP 46843 = WDS J09327+2659A *G9V: Adams35,1953UppAn...3h....W,Gray03(G9V(k)) K0V: Henry95 K1V(k): Gray06 65" binary (LDS 3903) with M5.5V star B. Star is chromospherically active star in Mt. Wilson survey, and discussed extensively in Henry95(1995AJ....110.2926H, Sec. 6.16). Henry95 tabulates published photometry - with V ranging from V=6.98(Sturch72) to V=7.032(Rufener76), B-V=0.77(Argue63) to 0.776(Sturch72), and U-B=0.33(Argue63) to 0.347(Sturch72). Prot = 5.43+-0.03day(Henry95), V-mag amplitudes varied from 0.03 to 0.08 mag over 4 seasons (average Vamp=0.06mag). Messina99 (1999A&A...347..249M) also wrote separate paper on the star's activity, and reported activity cycle of 3.89yr. The star's youth is supported by strong Li absorption (EW(Li6707) = 200+-12 mA; Bischoff20). V=7.001+-0.014(Mermilliod91), B-V=0.773+-0.005(Mermilliod91), U-B=0.336+-0.009(Mermilliod91). PASTEL median values: =5300K(N=5), logg=4.45(N=5), [Fe/H]=-0.12(N=5). plx = 55.3165+-0.0595mas(GaiaDR2), G= 6.8312+-0.0020, Bp=7.2718+-0.0073, Rp=6.2870+-0.0075, E(BR/RP)=1.192 (negligible excess), Bp-Rp=0.9848, Bp-G=0.4406, G-Rp=0.5441. G-V = 6.8312 - 7.001 = -0.1698. Mv = 5.715+-0.014(Mermilliod91,GaiaDR2). Additional comments: Average RV = 8.25+-0.07 km/s (Henry95). Sapozhnikov20 uses Gaia DR2 astrometry to estimate separation(AB) = 65.01" = 1175.3 au, 3D separation 4045.9 au. The difference in proper motion between A and B translates to a difference in velocity of only 0.338 km/s. Kral17 lists it as a debris disk star with L_IR/L* = 5.10e-5. Ages: 51.9+-23.1 Myr (Tetzlaff11), 250+-50 Myr (Meshkat17). Variously called member of Local Association (Montes01). See notes on HD 82443B in M5.5V.txt. HD 4747 = GJ 36 G7V: Adams35 G8/K0V: Houk88 *G9V: Gray06,Bidelman85(G9),Yoss79 K0V: Wilson62 Good agreement between Gray06, Bidelman85, Houk88, Yoss79. B-V=0.776+-0.009(Mermilliod91), V=7.158+-0.009(Mermilliod91), U-B=0.308+-0.044(Mermilliod91). PASTEL median values: =5390K (N=5), logg=4.56(N=2), [Fe/H]=-0.215(N=2). Mv=5.79. HD 145958 A *G9V: Abt81,Bidelman85(G9),Gray03 K0V: Adams35,Struve55(K0) 4" pair with HD 145958 B, classified G8+V by Gray03 or G9V by Abt81. So Abt81 considered the pair to have identical spectral types G9V. Mermilliod91 photometry is for unresolved pair: B-V=0.763+-0.005. Tycho photometry for A is consistent with B-V=0.767+-0.013. Mv(AB)=4.82. 41 Ara A = HR 6416 A = HD 156274 = GJ 666 A = LHS 444 = HIP 84720 (V=5.5) G8V: Evans57 G8/K0V: Houk78, BSC/Hoffleit91("G8-K0V") *G9V: Corbally84 K0V: 1943HarCi.449....1H,Bidelman85(K0) Brighter of 10.6" pair (B is ~M0V). V=5.557+-0.033(Mermilliod91), B-V=0.777+-0.005(Mermilliod91), U-B=0.357+-0.005(Mermilliod91). GaiaDR2 parallaxes of 120.1791+-0.4767mas(A), 113.8158 0.1227mas(B). plx = 113.61 0.69mas(HIP2). Mv=5.834+-0.036(Mermilliod91,HIP2). HD 135204 = LHS 393 G8V: Adams35,Keenan53,Abt81 G8/K0V: Houk99 *G9V: Gray03 K0V: Roman55,Cowley67,Bidelman85(K0) WDS lists it as equal brightness 0.1" binary (mag1=mag2=7.4). PASTEL: =5413K(N=10), =4.335(N=6), <[Fe/H]>=-0.11(N=7). V=6.601+-0.012(Mermilliod91), B-V=0.767+-0.010(Mermilliod91). For delta(V)=0.0, V(A)=V(B)=7.35. plx=57.9400+-0.0584mas(GaiaDR2) => Mv(A)=Mv(B)=6.17. # Other Stars HD 195987 *G9V: Adams35,Roman55,Gray03 K0V: Malmquist60,Ljunggren61,Bidelman85(K0) K0IV: Yoss61 Nearly evenly split, and may be best considered a "G9.5V", consistent with the slightly redder B-V compared to the other G9Vs. V=7.08(HIP), B-V=0.796+-0.007(HIP). HD 27250 G7: Wilson48 G8: Wilson62 *G9V: Morgan65 One of two Morgan65 Hyads classified G9V. B-V=0.745(HIP), whereas B-V(G8V)=0.75 and B-V(K0V)=0.83. HD 27732 G7: Wilson48 G8: Wilson62 *G9V: Morgan65 One of two Morgan65 Hyads classified G9V. B-V=0.758(HIP), whereas B-V(G8V)=0.75 and B-V(K0V)=0.83. Mv=5.33. HD 29231 = HIP 21327 G5: Cannon G8V: Houk82,Gliese91 *G9V: Gray06 Tied for median B-I color among Gray01/03/06 G9V stars. Gray06 lists [M/H]=0.04,logg=4.42, Teff=5353. dMv=-0.17 mag. So a fairly normal G9V dwarf. J0434-3539 (southern) HD 42250 = HIP 29761 G5: Cannon G7V: Adams35 *G9V: Gray03 Tied for median B-I color among Gray01/03/06 G9V stars. Gray03 lists [M/H]=0.10,logg=4.35, Teff=5367. dMv=-0.16 mag. So a fairly normal G9V dwarf. J0616+7047 (northern) Latham02 lists as SB1, but Nidever02 lists as RV rms < 100 m/s. HD 79096 = 81 Cnc = pi01 Cnc = BD+15 2003 = GJ 337 G5IV: 2000AbaOB..75...93C G7V: Adams35 *G8V: Harlan69,Cowley79,Abt81,Bidelman85(G8) G9V: Cowley69,Gray03 K0V: Nassau55 6th brightest "G9V" in Bright Star Catalog, but probably the only real dwarf among them. WDS 0.2" equal brightness SB2 binary whose glorious history is told in Griffin82^2 (1982Obs...102..217G; P=984+-7d, estimates masses 1.0 and 0.9 Msun). Orbit has semi-major axis 0.126" but was split with "eyepiece interferometer" by Finsen59. 43" pair with L8+T0 brown dwarf binary GJ 337CD = 2MASS J09121469+1459396. Mv=4.95(xHIP). V=6.500+-0.013(Mermilliod91), V(A)=7.20(WDS), V(B)=7.20(WDS), B-V=0.731+-0.006(Mermilliod91). For delta(V)=0.0(WDS) => V(A)=V(B)=7.25. plx=49.1493+-0.3467mas(GaiaDR2) => Mv(A)=Mv(B)=5.71+-0.02. HD 116442 *G9V: Gray03, Abt08 K0: Struve55 Just two classifications as G9V. V=7.060(Mermilliod91), B-V=0.780(Mermilliod91), U-B=0.380(Mermilliod91). Pair with HD 116443 (26" away), which is K2V (Gray03) or K1V (Abt08). HD 164922 G8V: Wilson62,Abt04 *G9V: Abt81,Gray03 K0V: Adams35,Roman55,Bidelman85(K0) K1V: Nassau47 V=7.015+-0.019(Mermilliod91), B-V=0.799+-0.005(Mermilliod91), U-B=0.468+-0.007(Mermilliod91). HD 191499 *G9V: Adams35,Gray03 K0V: Lindblad34,1953UppAn...3h....W, V=7.560+-0.063(Mermilliod91), B-V=0.810+-0.018(Mermilliod91). HD 225261 = HIP 400 *G9V: Gray03,Jaschek78(Yoss61) G5: Cannon From Skiff09, all (only 2) published MK types agree on G9V. B-V=0.755(HIP), whereas B-V(G8V)=0.75 and B-V(K0V)=0.83. HD 116956 = HIP 65515 *G9V: Gray03 G9IV-V: Yoss61 V=7.29(HIP), B-V=0.804+-0.011(HIP). PASTEL compendium: = 5366K(N=6), logg=4.55(N=5), [Fe/H]=0.08(N=5). HR 1232 = G9V: Wilson50 *K0/1III: Houk99 2nd brightest G9V in Bright Star Catalog (although brightest is an RS CVn system), but spectroscopic loggs are consistent with giant. PASTEL: =4929K(N=4), =3.23(N=4), <[Fe/H]>=+0.06(N=4). HD 90125 = HR 4085 = HIP 50939 G9V: Abt81 K0: Cannon *K0/1III: Houk99 3rd brightest "G9V" in Bright Star Catalog, but like the brighter two, also appears to be evolved (giant). Binary or triple in WDS, with closest companion B at 13.5" separation (mag=13.5). PASTEL: =4803K(N=3), =2.93(N=2), <[Fe/H]>=-0.11(N=2). HD 156826 = HR 6439 G5: Cannon G8V: Cowley79 *G8IV: Harlan74 G8.5IV: Buscombe95 G9V: Evans66 K0V: Houk 4th brightest "G9V" in Bright Star Catalog, but appears to be evolved metal-poor star. Faint companion 120" away in WDS (TOK 311). PASTEL: =5150K(N=5), =3.60(N=4), <[Fe/H]>=-0.235(N=4). HD 54563 = HR 2692 = HIP 34608 G7V: Adams35(Peat64,"dG7";Abt72,"DG7";Wilson53,"dG7") G8V: Harlan69 G9V: Cowley67(Hoffleit91) "(K2V) WLS": Buscombe95 5th brightest "G9V" in Bright Star Catalog, but appears to be evolved metal-poor. PASTEL: =4960K(N=6), =3.455(N=6), <[Fe/H]>=-0.40(N=6). HD 148614 = HR 6516 G5V: Abt81 G6: Bidelman85 G6V: Adams35 G7IV-V: Stephenson69 G8V: Wilson62 G8IV: 1966ArA.....3..501L G8IV-V: Roman52,Harlan74 G9-IV-V_Hdel1: Keenan80,Keenan89