M8V Kirkpatrick(in GrayCorbally09) lists Gl 752B (= vB 10) as the primary M8V standard. Kirkpatrick95 showed spectral classification scheme for M7V-M9V types and listed 5 M8Vs: RG0050-2722(M8:V), LP 412-31, LHS 2243, LHS 2397a, vB10. Boeshaar85 standard: GJ 752B (=VB 10) - M8V HenryKirkpatrick90 standard: GJ 752B (=VB 10) - M8V Kirkpatrick91 standard: GJ 752B (=VB 10) - M8V (primary standard) Kirkpatrick97 standards: LP 412-31 - M8V LHS 2397a - M8V Kirkpatrick99 standard: 2MASSW J1434+1940 - M8V Hawley02 standard: 2MASS J1047+4026 - M8V Henry02 standard: GJ 752B (=VB 10) - M8V Henry04 standard: GJ 752B (=VB 10) - M8.0V (primary standard) Kirkpatrick(GrayCorbally09) stan.: GJ 752B (=VB 10) - M8V (primary standard) Kirkpatrick10 standard: GJ 752B (=VB 10) - M8V (opt.,near-IR stan.) Kirkpatrick16 standard: LP 412-31 - M8V Kirkpatrick12 lists only 1 M8V star within 8pc: GJ 752B (=VB10) ReinersBasri09 finds that the mean kinematic age of nearby M7-M9.5 stars is 3.1 Gyr. (M8V) = 1.77 ; Fitzgerald70 (B-V)(M8V) = 1.93 ; SchmidtKaler82 (M8V) = 2.00 ; Johnson66 (B-V)(M8V) = 2.13 ; prim. stan. VB 10 (Leggett92) (B-V)(M8V) = 2.13+-0.07 ; pri. stan. VB10 (Harrington93) (B-V)(M8V) = 2.15 ; linear fit to Leggett92 (B-V=0.8367+0.2852*V-I, V-I=4.62) => adopt (B-V)(M8V) = 2.15 [updated 7/5/2020] (V-Ks)(M8V) = 7.991 ; exemplar LHS 2243 = LP 315-53 (M8V) = 6.75 ; Johnson66 (V-Ks)(M8V) = 8.50 ; trend fit to Dahn17 for M8V (V-Ks)(M8V) = 8.506 ; exemplar LHS 132 = LP 938-71 (V-Ks)(M8V) = 8.571 ; sec. stan. LP 412-31 (V-Ks)(M8V) = 8.58 ; smoothed fit to Dieterich SpT vs V-Ks (V-Ks)(M8V) = 8.598 ; exemplar LP 771-21 (M8V) = 8.7 ; Beuermann06 (V-Ks)(M8V) = 8.695 ; sec. stan. LHS 2397a (V-Ks)(M8V) = 8.701 ; exemplar CE 303 = SIPS J1309-2330 = 2MASS J13092185-2330350 (V-Ks)(M8V) = 8.755 ; pri. stan. GJ 752B = VB 10 (V-Ks)(M8V) = 8.918 ; exemplar LEHPM 2-183 = DENIS J051737.7-334903 (V-Ks)(M8V) = 8.96 ; exemplar RG 0050-2722 => adopt (V-Ks)(M8V) = 8.70 *** [updated 12/23/2020] [EEM 12/23/2020: see comments below, M_Ks vs. Mv diagram suggests that the values for LHS 2397a seem to be typical for the subtype, supporting V-Ks=8.7] => adopt (V-J)(M8V) = 7.541 [updated 12/23/2020] => adopt (V-H)(M8V) = 8.210 => adopt (J-Ks)(M8V) = 1.124 => adopt (I-Ks)(M8V) = 4.158 => adopt (V-I)(M8V) = 4.572 (M8V) = 1.15 ; Johnson66 (G-J)(M8V) = 3.732 ; Bentley18 (G-V)(M8V) = -3.306 ; exemplar RG 0050-2722 = 2MASS J00525468-2705597 (G-V)(M8V) = -3.244 ; exemplar LEHPM 2-183 = DENIS J051737.7-334903 (G-V)(M8V) = -3.229 ; exemplar CE 303 = SIPS J1309-2330 (G-V)(M8V) = -3.207 ; exemplar LHS 132 = LP 938-71 (G-V)(M8V) = -3.1988 ; pri. stan. VB10 (G-V)(M8V) = -3.17 ; Mv=18.62, M_G=15.45 (G-V)(M8V) = -3.1536 ; exemplar LP 771-21 = 2MASS J02484100-1651216 (G-V)(M8V) = -3.11 ; trinomial trend through late Ms (G-V)(M8V) = -3.0833 ; sec. stan. LP412-31 (G-V)(M8V) = -3.0132 ; sec. stan. LHS 2397a (G-V)(M8V) = -2.812 ; exemplar LHS 2243 = LP 315-53 (G-V)(M8V) = -2.517 ; median M8V d<60pc (N=13) in SIMBAD (likely biased blue) => adopt (G-V)(M8V) = -3.17 [updated 12/23/2020] (Mv=18.62, M_G=15.45) (Bp-Rp)(M8V) = 4.18 ; Kiman19 (Bp-Rp)(M8V) = 4.6359 ; LP_412-31 sec. stan. (Bp-Rp)(M8V) = 4.762 ; GaiaDR2 field trend for M_G=15.1 (Bp-Rp)(M8V) = 4.7954 ; LHS 2397a = GJ_3655 sec. stan. (Bp-Rp)(M8V) = 4.848 ; M5-M8.5 color trend (Bp-Rp)(M8V) = 4.9723 ; GJ_752B/VB10 pri. stan. (Bp-Rp)(M8V) = 5.1972 ; DENIS_J1048.0-3956 M8V => adopt (Bp-Rp)(M8V) = 4.85 [updated 11/18/2020] (G-Rp)(M8V) = 1.555 ; GaiaDR2 field trend for M_G=15.1 (G-Rp)(M8V) = 1.5568 ; LP_412-31 sec. stan. (G-Rp)(M8V) = 1.561 ; Reyle18 polynomial (G-Rp)(M8V) = 1.567 ; M6.5-L2 color trend (G-Rp)(M8V) = 1.5671 ; GJ_752B pri. stan. (G-Rp)(M8V) = 1.57 ; Kiman19 (G-Rp)(M8V) = 1.577 ; color trend M0V-M9V (G-Rp)(M8V) = 1.5877 ; DENIS_J1048.0-3956 M8V (G-Rp)(M8V) = 1.5926 ; LHS 2397a = GJ_3655 sec. stan. (G-Rp)(M8V) = 1.61 ; Smart19 => adopt (G-Rp)(M8V) = 1.57 [updated 11/18/2020] (Bp-G)(M8V) = 2.65 ; Kiman19 (Bp-G)(M8V) = 3.0790 ; LP_412-31 sec. stan. (Bp-G)(M8V) = 3.2028 ; LHS 2397a = GJ_3655 sec. stan. (Bp-G)(M8V) = 3.206 ; GaiaDR2 field trend for M_G=15.1 (Bp-G)(M8V) = 3.28 ; Bp-Rp=4.85, G-Rp=1.57 (Bp-G)(M8V) = 3.4052 ; GJ_752B pri. stan. => adopt (Bp-G)(M8V) = 3.28 [updated 3/1/2019; Bp-Rp=4.85, G-Rp=1.57] M_G(M8V) = 14.212 ; Reyle18 polynomial M_G(M8V) = 14.6 ; Kiman19 M_G(M8V) = 14.61 ; exemplar LHS 2243 = L 315-53 M_G(M8V) = 14.76 ; SIMBAD nearest 10 M8Vs median M_G(M8V) = 14.96 ; trend d<20pc late M dwarfs for M8V M_G(M8V) = 15.09 ; exemplar LHS 132 = LP 938-71 M_G(M8V) = 15.11 ; exemplar LP 771-21 M_G(M8V) = 15.14 ; median for d<25pc SIMBAD M8V M_G(M8V) = 15.24 ; Smart19 (N=16, rms=0.63] M_G(M8V) = 15.26 ; exemplar CE 303 = 2MASS J13092185-2330350 M_G(M8V) = 15.30 ; sec. stan. LP 412-31 M_G(M8V) = 15.37 ; exemplar LEHPM 2-183 = DENIS J051737.7-334903 M_G(M8V) = 15.46 ; pri. stan. GJ 752B = VB 10 M_G(M8V) = 15.46 ; exemplar LEHPM 2-381 = SSSPM J2052-4759 M_G(M8V) = 15.60 ; trend SIMBAD d<10pc sample M_G(M8V) = 15.63 ; sec. stan. LHS 2397a = LP 732-94 M_G(M8V) = 16.21 ; exeplar RG 0050-2722 = 2MASS J00525468-2705597 The pri. and 2 sec. standards are near the middle of the distribution among the exemplars. Adopting M_G for VB10 (15.46) and M_Ks=9.92 M8V standards and exemplars roughly follow trend: M_G ~ 2.4253 + 1.30981*M_Ks M_J(M8V) = 10.222 ; Reyle18 polynomial M_H(M8V) = 9.631 ; Reyle18 polynomial M_Ks(M8V) = 9.271 ; Reyle18 polynomial (G-J)(M8V) = 4.359 ; Reyle18 polynomial (J-Ks)(M8V) = 1.006 ; Reyle18 polynomial (R-I)(M8V) = 2.456 ; N=5 M8Vs in Liebert06 (+-0.035 sem, +-0.079 rms) => adopt (R-I)(M8V) = 2.45 (V-Rc)(M8V) = 2.00 ; sec. stan. LHS 2397a (Bessell91) (V-Rc)(M8V) = 2.15 ; assuming V-I=4.60, R-I=2.45 (V-Rc)(M8V) = 2.23 ; sec. stan. LP 412-31 (Reid04) (V-Rc)(M8V) = 2.42 ; pri. stan. VB 10 (see below) (M8V) = 2.50 ; Johnson66 => adopt (V-Rc)(M8V) = 2.15 (V-Ic)(M8V) = 4.23 ; sec. stan. LHS 2397a (Bessell91) (V-Ic)(M8V) = 4.51 ; sec. stan. LP 412-31 (Reid04) (M8V) = 4.610 (+-0.055 sem, +-0.095 stdev) [N=3 standards] (V-Ic)(M8V) = 4.62 ; trend Dieterich14 SpT vs. V-Ic (V-Ic)(M8V) = 4.68 ; pri. stan. VB 10 (see below) (V-Ic)(M8V) = 4.68 ; non-standard RG 0050-2722 (see below) (V-Ic)(M8V) = 4.70 ; exemplar LP 771-21 (M8V) = 4.70 ; Johnson66 => adopt (V-Ic)(M8V) = 4.62 [updated 7/4/2020] (M8V) = 5.80 ; Johnson66 (J-H)(M8V) = 0.64 (+-0.15 rms) ; Schmidt14 (J-H)(M8V) = 0.652 ; Winters15 fit for V-Ks=8.65 (J-H)(M8V) = 0.672 (+-0.007 sem, +-0.032 stdev) ; N=17 M8V Cruz03 (J-H)(M8V) = 0.669 ; color poly fit for V-Ks=8.65 => adopt (J-H)(M8V) = 0.669 [updated 12/23/2020] (H-Ks)(M8V) = 0.453 ; trend of Dieterich14 for V-Ks=8.73 (H-Ks)(M8V) = 0.440 ; MS dwarf color trend for V-Ks=8.65 (M8V) = 0.43 ; Beuermann06 (H-Ks)(M8V) = 0.414 (+-0.012 sem,+-0.040 stdev) ; N=17 M8V Cruz03 (H-Ks)(M8V) = 0.39 (+-0.17 rms) ; Schmidt14 => adopt (H-Ks)(M8V) = 0.44 [last updated 12/23/2020] (M8V) = 1.14 ; Faherty09 (J-Ks)(M8V) = 1.087 (+-0.015 sem,+-0.065 stdev) ; N=17 M8V Cruz03 (M8V) = 1.05 ; Beuermann06 (J-Ks)(M8V) = 1.03 (+-0.17 rms) ; Schmidt14 (r-i)(M8V) = 1.913 (+-0.05 rms) ; West05 fit for (V-Ic)=4.62 (r-i)(M8V) = 2.73 (+-0.25 rms) ; West08 (i-z)(M8V) = 1.718 ; poly fit to SIMBAD d<75pc M dwarfs for G-Ks=5.53 (i-z)(M8V) = 1.58 (+-0.15 rms) ; West08 (i-z)(M8V) = 1.48 (+-0.14 rms) ; Schmidt14 => adopt (i-z)(M8V) = 1.72 [updated 12/27/2021] (z-J)(M8V) = 2.172 (+-0.053 rms) ; poly fit d<50pc SIMBAD M dwarfs for G-Ks=5.53 (z-J)(M8V) = 2.04 (+-0.12 rms) ; West08 (z-J)(M8V) = 1.95 (+-0.15 rms) ; Schmidt14 => adopt (z-J)(M8V) = 2.17 mag [updated 12/27/2021] (i-J)(M8V) = 3.41 (+-0.26 rms) ; Schmidt14 (i-Ks)(M8V) = 4.42 (+-0.31 rms) ; Schmidt14 (Ks-L')(M8V) = 0.362 ; Dupuy12 polynomial (Ks-W1)(M8V) = 0.20 (+-0.14 rms) ; Schmidt14 (Ks-W1)(M8V) = 0.220 ; Best18/allWISE (Ks-W1)(M8V) = 0.222 ; Bentley18 (Ks-W1)(M8V) = 0.230 0.032 ; pri. stan. VB10/allWISE (Ks-W1)(M8V) = 0.280 ; Dupuy12 median (N=10, d<50pc) (Ks-W1)(M8V) = 0.282 ; fit to Winters15 data for V-Ks=8.70 (Ks-W1)(M8V) = 0.285 ; Dupuy12 trend (Ks-W1)(M8V) = 0.300 0.032 ; pri. stan. VB10/WISE (Ks-W1)(M8V) = 0.309 ; Avenhaus12 for V-Ks=8.70 (Ks-W1)(M8V) = 0.390 ; sec. stan. LHS2397a/WISE (Ks-W1)(M8V) = 0.386 ; sec. stan. LHS2397a/allWISE => adopt (Ks-W1)(M8V) = 0.285 [updated 12/28/2019] (Ks-W2)(M8V) = 0.466 ; Bentley18 (W1-W2)(M8V) = 0.22 (+-0.07 rms) ; Schmidt14 (W1-W2)(M8V) = 0.244 ; Bentley18 (W2-W3)(M8V) = 0.34 (+-0.20 rms) ; Schmidt14 (G-Ks)(M8V) = 4.679 ; Bentley18 (G-Ks)(M8V) = 5.179 ; exemplar LHS 2243 = LP 315-53 (G-Ks)(M8V) = 5.299 ; exemplar LHS 132 = LP 938-71 (G-Ks)(M8V) = 5.430 ; exemplar LEHPM 2-381 = SSSPM J2052-4759 (G-Ks)(M8V) = 5.444 ; exemplar LP 771-21 (G-Ks)(M8V) = 5.472 ; exemplar CE 303 = SIPS J1309-2330 = 2MASS J13092185-2330350 (G-Ks)(M8V) = 5.488 ; sec. stan. LP 412-31 = NLTT 10644 (G-Ks)(M8V) = 5.488 ; smooth trend M7V-M9V (G-Ks)(M8V) = 5.53 ; locus for 3 standards in M_Ks(9.92) vs. M_G(15.45) (G-Ks)(M8V) = 5.556 ; pri. stan. VB 10 (G-Ks)(M8V) = 5.654 ; exemplar RG 0050-2722 = 2MASS J00525468-2705597 (G-Ks)(M8V) = 5.674 ; exemplar LEHPM 2-183 = DENIS J051737.7-334903 (G-Ks)(M8V) = 5.682 ; sec. stan. LHS 2397a = LP 732-94 => adopt (G-Ks)(M8V) = 5.53 [updated 12/26/2020] (M_Ks=9.92, M_G=15.45) Mv(M8V) = 16.0 ; Schmidt-Kaler82 Mv(M8V) = 18.26 ; exemplar LP 771-21 Mv(M8V) = 18.31 ; exemplar LHS 132 = LP 938-71 Mv(M8V) = 18.38 ; sec. stan. LP412-31 Mv(M8V) = 18.49 ; exemplar CE 303 = 2MASS J13092185-2330350 Mv(M8V) = 18.60 ; EEM fit to Reid CNS3 data (V-K=8.65) Mv(M8V) = 18.617 (+-0.115 sem, +-0.200 stdev) [N=3 standards] Mv(M8V) = 18.62 ; M_Ks=9.92, V-Ks=8.70 (supported by M_Ks vs. Mv distribution for standards+exemplars) Mv(M8V) = 18.62 ; exemplar LEHPM 2-183 = DENIS J051737.7-334903 Mv(M8V) = 18.66 ; pri. stan. GJ 752B Mv(M8V) = 18.75 ; Dieterich14 calibration for V-K=8.65 Mv(M8V) = 18.76 ; Kirkpatrick94 Mv(M8V) = 18.80 ; sec. stan. LHS 2397a Mv(M8V) = 19.0 ; Reid04 Mv(M8V) = 19.52 ; exemplar RG 0050-2722 = 2MASS J00525468-2705597 => adopt Mv(M8V) = 18.62 mag [updated 12/23/2020] (M_G=15.45, G-V=-3.17, V-Ks=8.70, M_Ks=9.92) => adopt M_G(M8V) = 15.45 mag [updated 12/23/2020] (M_Ks=9.92, G-Ks=5.53, Mv=18.62, G-V=-3.17) => adopt M_Ks(M8V) = 9.92 mag [updated 12/23/2020] (M_G=15.45, G-Ks=5.53) M_Ks(M8V) = 8.770 ; LP 349-25 = 2MASSW J0027559+221932 M_Ks(M8V) = 9.428 ; exemplar LHS 2243 = LP 315-53 M_Ks(M8V) = 9.666 ; exemplar LP 771-21 M_Ks(M8V) = 9.696 ; exemplar LEHPM 2-183 = DENIS J051737.7-334903 M_Ks(M8V) = 9.756 ; LP 326-21 M_Ks(M8V) = 9.788 ; exemplar LHS 132 = LP 938-71 M_Ks(M8V) = 9.789 ; exemplar CE 303 = SIPS J1309-2330 = 2MASS J13092185-2330350 M_Ks(M8V) = 9.802 ; SIPS J1607-0442 M_Ks(M8V) = 9.802 ; LP 885-35 M_Ks(M8V) = 9.810 ; sec. stan. LP 412-31 [nearest middle of locus for standards/exemplars] M_Ks(M8V) = 9.81 ; Dupuy12 polynomial M_Ks(M8V) = 9.83 ; Dupuy12 mean M_Ks(M8V) = 9.870 ; LSPM J0714+3702 M_Ks(M8V) = 9.904 ; pri. stan. VB 10 M_Ks(M8V) = 9.904 (+-0.039 sem, +-0.067 stdev) [N=3 standards] M_Ks(M8V) = 9.92 ; eyeballed locus among standards in M_Ks(9.92) vs. M_G(15.45) space M_Ks(M8V) = 9.945 ; sec. stan. LHS 2397a M_Ks(M8V) = 9.95 ; EEM fit to Reid CNS3 data (V-K=8.65 => Mv=18.60) M_Ks(M8V) = 10.030 ; exemplar LEHPM 2-381 = SSSPM J2052-4759 M_Ks(M8V) = 10.10 ; Dieterich14 calibration for V-Ks=8.65) M_Ks(M8V) = 10.56 ; exemplar RG 0050-2722 Teff(M8V) = 2806 K ; sec. stan. LP 412-31 (Rice10) Teff(M8V) = 2750 K ; Johnson66 Teff(M8V) = 2705 K ; exemplar LHS 2243 Teff(M8V) = 2652 K ; Dupuy17(SaumonMarley08 models scale) Teff(M8V) = 2640 K ; Schmidt-Kaler82 Teff(M8V) = 2640 K ; Dupuy17(Lyon models scale) Teff(M8V) = 2630 K ; sec. stan. LHS 2397a (Freed03) Teff(M8V) = 2624 K ; 2M 1440+1339 (Dieterich14) Teff(M8V) = 2600 K ; Rajpurohit13(N=5) Teff(M8V) = 2593 K ; RojasAyala12(mean N=3 M8V stars) Teff(M8V) = 2570 K ; empirical L-R relation, for logL=-3.292 Teff(M8V) = 2562 K ; EEM N=21 Teffs Teff(M8V) = 2550 K ; pri. stan. GJ 752B (VB 10) (see below) Teff(M8V) = 2539 K ; Filippazzo15 calibration (M6V-T9V) Teff(M8V) = 2533 K ; Rajpurohit18 (mean for N=3 M8Vs) Teff(M8V) = 2513 K ; LHS 132 (Dieterich14) Teff(M8V) = 2512 K ; LP771-21 (Dieterich14) Teff(M8V) = 2500 K ; Cifuentes20 for CARMENES M8V(N=9) Teff(M8V) = 2490 K ; Golimowski04 Teff(M8V) = 2481 K ; LHS2195 (Dieterich14) Teff(M8V) = 2466 K ; SIP1607-0442 (Dieterich14) Teff(M8V) = 2439 K ; mean photometric Teff Teff(M8V) = 2403 K ; ESO207-061 (Dieterich14) => adopt Teff(M8V) = 2570 K (logT = 3.410) [adopted 11/3/2019] BCv(M8V) = -3.97 mag ; Schmidt-Kaler82(BCv=-4.1 + 0.13 offset) BCv(M8V) = -5.65 mag ; BC_K=3.05, V-K=8.70 BCv(M8V) = -5.79 mag ; Mbol=13.09, Mv=18.88 => adopt BCv(M8V) = -5.65 mag [updated 11/3/2019] BC_Ks(M8V)= 2.879 ; pri. stan. GJ 752B (see below) BC_Ks(M8V)= 2.94 ; Mbol=13.09, M_Ks=10.15 (based on Dieterich14) BC_Ks(M8V)= 3.00 ; Schmidt14 (rms = 0.07) BC_Ks(M8V)= 3.001 ; sec. stan. LP 412-31 (see below) BC_Ks(M8V)= 3.054 ; sec. stan. LHS 2397a (see below) BC_Ks(M8V)= 3.055 ; Filipazzo15 (field) BC_K(M8V) = 3.077 ; Leggett01 polynomial for J-K=1.121 BC_K(M8V) = 3.097 ; Golimowski04(SpT function) BC_K(M8V) = 3.114 ; Leggett01 polynomial for I-K=4.143 BC_Ks(M8V)= 3.132 ; interp M6V-L1V for V-Ks=8.70 => adopt BC_K(M8V) = 3.05 [adopted 11/3/2019] logL(M8V) = -3.625 ; ESO207-061 (Dieterich14) logL(M8V) = -3.507 ; LP 771-21 (Dieterich14) logL(M8V) = -3.399 ; LHS 2195 (Dieterich14) logL(M8V) = -3.340 ; pri. stan. GJ 752B (Dieterich14) logL(M8V) = -3.292 ; M_Ks=9.92, BC_K=3.05 => Mbol=12.970 logL(M8V) = -3.271 ; SIP1607-0442 (Dieterich14) logL(M8V) = -3.194 ; LHS 0132 (Dieterich14) logL(M8V) = -3.163 ; 2MASS 1440+1339 (Dieterich14) => adopt logL(M8V) = -3.292 dex [updated 11/15/2021] => adopt Mbol(M8V) = 12.970 mag [updated 11/15/2021] Mass(M8V) = 0.082 Msun ; Benedict16 calib. for M_Ks=9.92 Mass(M8V) = 0.086 Msun ; Mann18 calib. for M_Ks=9.92 Mass(M8V) = 0.088 Msun ; M_Ks=9.92 => EEM fit to M_Ks vs. Msun for Dupuy10 data => adopt Mass(M8V) = 0.086 Msun [updated 11/15/2021] Rad(M8V) = 0.1140 Rsun ; logL=-3.292, Teff=2570K Rad(M8V) = 0.120 Rsun ; median of 6 M8V radii from Dieterich14 => adopt Rad(M8V) = 0.114 Rsun [updated 11/15/2021] # No Standard Keenan85 and Houk75 do not list M8V standards. Skiff08 does not flag any stars as M4V MK standards. # Primary Standard GJ 752B = VB 10 = V1298 Aql = LHS 474 = LTT 15646 = G 22-22B *M8V: Boeshaar85(dM8),HenryKirkpatrick90,Kirkpatrick91,Kirkpatrick93,Boeshaar94,Henry97,Hawley97(M8c),Henry02,Henry04(M8.0Ve:, standard),ReidGizis05(M8.0Ve),PhanBao06(M8.0e) M7V: Bessell91 Ubiquitous M8V standard, although the star appears to be slightly metal-rich and ~0.2-0.25 mag above the MS in visible (G) and near-IR (Ks) bands. Not listed in Reid04. plx=170.26+-1.37(Gould04,HIP), plx=173.3+-4.0 mas(Harrington93), plx=170.1+-0.8mas(Newton14), logL=-3.71+-0.17(Newton14), -3.34+-0.009(Dieterich14), R=0.115+-0.003(Dieterich14), V=17.2: (Bessell91), V=17.32(Lepine05), V=17.50(Leggett92), V=17.38,17.58(Gliese69;in ProbstLiebert83), V=17.78(Kron58), V=17.52+-0.01(Harrington92), I adopt Harrington92 Vmag. B-V=2.13(Leggett92), B-V=2.13+-0.07(Harrington92), Rc=15.10(Bessell91), V-R=2.10(Bessell91), V-Rc = 17.52 - 15.10 = 2.42 (Harrington92,Bessell91), Ic=12.84(Bessell91), V-I=4.36(Bessell91), V-Ic = 17.52 - 12.84 = 4.68 (Harrington92,Bessell91), V-I=4.70(Leggett92), K_CIT=8.80(Leggett92), (V-Ks)_CIT=8.70(Leggett92), J=9.908+-0.025(2MASS), H=9.226+-0.026(2MASS), Ks=8.765+-0.022(2MASS), (V-Ks)=8.755(Harrington92,2MASS). mbol = 11.644+-0.078(JHK=>Pecaut13). BC_Ks = 11.644 - 8.765 = 2.879. Teffs: 2478+-29K(Dieterich14), 2640K(Cesetti13), 2700K(Rajpurojit13) => ~ 2600K. Colors are outside the range of the Casagrande08 bolometric magnitude equations. Teffs: 2250K(Casagrande08*), 2478+-29K(Dieterich14), 2550K(Lyubchik12*;average), 2600K(Pavlenko02*), 2700K(Bailey12*) => post-2000 values consistent with ~2550K, excluding Casagrande08. [Fe/H]=-0.14,0.08,0.09(Newton14, 3 estimates), so approximately solar. Note that there are two published metallicity estimates for its primary GJ 752A ([Fe/H]=0.10+-0.08(Mann15), [Fe/H]=0.06+-0.12(Newton14)). Taken together, the median metallicity estimate is [Fe/H] = +0.08. M_Ks places it 0.21 mag above locus of V-Ks vs. Mv., which makes sense if the star is somewhat metal-rich compared to typical M dwarfs. GaiaDR2: 168.9620+-0.1299mas, G=14.3212+-0.0007, Bp=17.7264+-0.0171, Rp= 12.7541+-0.0042, Bp-Rp=4.9723, Bp-G=3.4052, G-Rp=1.5671. G-V = 14.3212 - 17.52 = -3.1988. Ks-W1=0.23. M_G=15.460+-0.002. M_Ks=9.90(2MASS,GaiaDR2), Mv=18.66(Harrington92,GaiaDR2). (G-Ks)=5.556, M_G=15.460, M_Ks=9.904. For its G-Ks color, the MS locus for d<15pc star is at M_Ks=10.16, M_G=15.72, so VB10 is clearly above the MS (del(M_Ks) = -0.256, del(M_G) = -0.26). # Secondary Standards LHS 2397a = LP 732-94 = GJ 3655 = NN 3655 = NSV 18756 *M8V: Giampapa86,Kirkpatrick92(PhD),Kirkpatrick97(stan),ReidGizis05(M8.0Ve),Leggett10 M8+L7.5: Freed03 M8.5: Cruz03, Jenkins09 M7e: Bessell91 This standard is closest to the mean trend for M_Ks vs. Mv among standards & exemplars, and supports its colors (V-Ks) ~ 8.7 as typical for the subtype. plx=70.0+-2.1 mas(Monet92), 73.0+-2.10(Dupuy12). V=19.43(Hosey15)[adopt], V=19.57(Leggett92,Monet92,vanAltena95), V=19.57+-0.04(Dahn02), V=19.1(Bessell91), Rc=17.1(Bessell91), Rc=17.33(Hosey15), V-Rc=2.00(Bessell91), Ic=14.87(Bessell91), Ic=14.84(Hosey15), V-Ic=4.23(Bessell91), V-I=4.62(Leggett92), K_CIT=10.77(Leggett92), (V-Ks)_CIT=8.80(Leggett92), K-L'(MKO) = 0.67(Leggett92), J=11.928+-0.021(2MASS), H=11.233+-0.025(2MASS), Ks=10.735+-0.023(2MASS). WISE: W1=10.345+-0.028, W2=10.087+-0.030, W3=9.583+-0.039. AllWISE: W1=10.349+-0.036, W2=10.070+-0.038, W3=9.603+-0.055. Ks-W1=0.390(WISE), Ks-W1=0.386(allWISE). Plavchan08 presents 2MASS photometry from the calibration field data: J=11.8968+-0.0007, H=11.1762+-0.0008, Ks=10.6948+-0.0007. (V-J)=7.6732(Leggett92,Plavchan08), (V-H)=8.3938(Leggett92,Plavchan08), (V-Ks)=8.735(Hosey15,Plavchan08), (V-Ks)=8.69(Hosey15), (V-K)s = 19.43 - 10.735 = 8.695. Mv=18.795+-0.066(Monet92,Leggett92), M_Ks=9.920+-0.065(Plavchan08,Monet92). mbol=13.748+-0.066(JHK=>Pecaut13). BC_Ks=13.748-10.6948 = 3.054. Tight binary (0.2") found by Freed et al. 2003, delta(J)=3.8mag, delta(K)=2.8(Dupuy12), companion has SpT=L7.5. Teffs: 2300K(Irwin91), 2376+-25K(Dieterich14), 2630K(Freed03) => Teff=2630K. Could not find a metallicity estimate. GaiaDR2: 69.4903+-0.1760 mas, G=16.4168+-0.0022, Bp=19.6196+-0.0423, Rp=14.8242+-0.0077, Bp-Rp=4.7954, Bp-G=3.2028, G-Rp=1.5926. G-V = 16.4168 - 19.43 = -3.0132. (G-Ks)=5.682, M_G=15.627, M_Ks=9.945, Mv=18.64(Hosey15,GaiaDR2). LP 412-31 = NLTT 10644 = 2MASS J03205965+1854233 *M8V: Kirkpatrick95,Kirkpatrick97(stan),Cruz03,Henry04,Cruz07,Schmidt07,Kirkpatrick16(stan) M9V: Cruz02 plx=68.9+-0.6 mas(Dahn02), V=19.21(Reid02,Henry04), Rc=16.98(Henry04), Ic=14.70(Henry04), V-I=4.51(Reid02,Henry04), V-R=2.23(Reid02,Henry04), J=11.759+-0.021(2MASS), H=11.066+-0.022(2MASS), Ks=10.639+-0.018(2MASS), (V-Ks)=8.571(Ried02,2MASS), (V-Ks)_CIT=8.80(Leggett92), mbol = 13.64+-0.04(JHK=>Pecaut13), BC_Ks = 13.64 - 10.639 = 3.001. Star is too red for Teff calibrations of Casagrande08. Schmidt07 reports mbol = 13.67, Fbol=9.60e-11 mW/m^2. Teffs: 2191K(Jenkins09), 2806K(Rice10). I adopt Rice10's value. Teffs for late Ms in Jenkins09 seems systematically too low. Could not find a metallicity estimate. GaiaDR2: plx = 68.2785+-0.1466 mas, G = 16.1267+-0.0025, Bp = 19.2057+-0.0468, Rp=14.5699+-0.0081, Bp-Rp=4.6359, Bp-G=3.0790, G-Rp=1.5568. G-V = 16.1267 - 19.21 = -3.0833. M_G=15.298+-0.005, Mv=18.38, M_J=10.93+-0.02, (G-Ks)=5.488, M_G=15.299, M_Ks=9.810. # Exemplars LHS 2243 = LP 315-53 = 2MASS J10163470+2751497 M7: Basri06 M7.5: Reid02,Cruz03,Berger06 *M8V: Kirkpatrick92(PhD),Kirkpatrick93,Kirkpatrick95,Martin94(M8e),Cruz07,Reiners09,West11(M8e),Kirkpatrick11,West15 One of the original 5 M8Vs listed in Kirkpatrick95, perhaps the bluest/hottest and there are some hotter classifications in literature. V=18.946+-0.004(Costa06), R=16.858+-0.009(Costa06), I=14.555+-0.013(Costa06), J=11.987+-0.019, H=11.331+-0.022, Ks=10.955+-0.018(2MASS), V-Ks = 18.946 - 10.955 = 7.991. plx = 49.4994 0.1390mas(GaiaDR2) => Mv=17.42, M_Ks=9.428+-0.019(2MASS,DR2). G=16.1343+-0.0031(GaiaDR2) => M_G = 14.607+-0.007. Teffs: 2598K(Anders19), 2811+-157K(Stassun19), 3296K(GaiaDR2,ignore) => = 2705K. (G-Ks)=5.179, M_G=14.607, M_Ks=9.428. G-V = 16.1343-18.946 = -2.812. LP 771-21 = 2MASS J02484100-1651216 = BR 0246-1703 *M8Ve: Kirkpatrick97,Reid04(M8e,M8.0),Kirkpatrick11(M8V) M8 in all references. V=20.02+-0.026(Dieterich14), Ic=15.32+-0.014(Dieterich14), V-Ic=4.70(Dieterich14), G=16.8664+-0.0018(GaiaDR2), Ks=11.422+-0.021 => G-V=-3.1536, V-Ks=8.598. plx=44.5509+-0.1472mas(GaiaDR2) => M_G = 15.111+-0.007, Mv=18.264+-0.027, M_Ks=9.666+-0.022. (G-Ks)=5.444. RG 0050-2722 = 2MASS J00525468-2705597 *M8.0V: Kirkpatrick93(M8),Kirkpatrick95(M8:V),Henry04 M9.0: Dieterich14(cites Crifo05?) One of the first five M8Vs listed in Kirkpatrick95, but it is "M8:V" and it appears to be systematically much dimmer than other M8Vs. Discovered ReidGilmore81, discussed in Liebert82 (shows spectrum to be similar to VB10, hence ~M8V; Skiff cites it as "M7.5:V" but it is not explicitly stated anywhere). Most recent publications repeat M8V. V=21.50(Henry04), V=21.51(vanAltena95), Ic=16.82(Henry04), V-Ic=4.68(Henry04), J=13.611+-0.026(2MASS), H=12.984+-0.032(2MASS), Ks=12.540+-0.029(2MASS). V-Ks = 21.50-12.540 = 8.96. G=18.1941+-0.0020(GaiaDR2). plx= 40.1790+-0.2291mas(GaiaDR2). Mv=19.52, M_G=16.214+-0.013, M_Ks=10.56+-0.03. (G-Ks)=5.654. G-V = 18.1941 - 21.50 = -3.306. CE 303 = SIPS J1309-2330 = 2MASS J13092185-2330350 M7Ve: Gizis02 *M8V: Cruz03,Lodieu05(M8e),Reid07(M8) V=19.37(Winters19), R=17.00(Winters19), I=14.58(Winters19), J=11.785+-0.022(2MASS), H=11.082+-0.022(2MASS), Ks=10.669+-0.024(2MASS), V-Ks = 19.37 - 10.669 = 8.701. GaiaEDR3: plx=66.6038+-0.0976mas => Mv=18.49(Winters19,GaiaEDR3). (G-Ks)=5.472, M_G=15.261, M_Ks=9.789, G=16.141(GaiaDR2). G-V = 16.141 - 19.37 = -3.229. LHS 132 = LP 938-71 = NLTT 3459 = 2MASS J01025100-3737438 = APMPM J0103-3738 *M8.0e: Reyle06(optical),Reid08(optical,M8),BardalezGagliuffi14(near-IR,"M8.1" from SpeX) M9: Burgasser15(optical) Luyten proper motion star with spectrum first reported by Reyle06 and first argued to be very nearby (~10 pc). V=18.575+-0.056(Costa05), R=16.223+-0.016(Costa05), J=11.130+-0.023(2MASS), H=10.479+-0.024(2MASS), Ks=10.069+-0.021(2MASS) => V-Ks = 18.575 - 10.069 = 8.506. GaiaEDR3: plx=88.2915+-0.0558mas => Mv=18.305+-0.056(Costa05,GaiaEDR3). Teff: 2600K(Rajpurohit13). (G-Ks)=5.299, M_G=15.087, M_Ks=9.788. G-V = 15.368 - 18.575 = -3.207. LEHPM 2-381 = SSSPM J2052-4759 M8e: Lodieu05(optical) M8: BardalezGagliuffi14(near-IR) GaiaEDR3: plx=42.6630+-0.1568mas. (G-Ks)=5.43, M_G=15.460, M_Ks=10.030. LEHPM 2-183 = DENIS J051737.7-334903 = 2MASS J05173766-3349027 *M8Ve: Cruz03(M8V),PhanBao06(M8.0),Burgasser15(M8) M9.5: BardalezGagliuffi14(near-IR,"M9.4",SpeX) PhanBao06 reports types from a few different indices: M7.1(VOa), M8.5(TiO5), M8.9(PC3) and they adopt M8.0 and report 8.1A Halpha emission. V=19.75(Winters19), R=17.38(Winters19), I=14.96(Winters19), J=12.004+-0.022(2MASS), H=11.317+-0.024(2MASS), Ks=10.832+-0.022(2MASS), V-Ks = 19.75 - 10.832 = 8.918. GaiaEDR3: plx=59.4702+-0.0779mas => Mv=18.62. (G-Ks)=5.674, M_G=15.370, M_Ks=9.696. G-V = 16.506 - 19.75 = -3.244. # Other Stars 2MASS J1047+4026 = LP 213-68 = LDS 4016B = 2MASS J10471381+4026493 = SDSS J104713.69+402649.2 M8Ve: Gizis00(Reid03) M9: West11 Some sleuthing is required to figure out which star is "2MASS 1047+4026" - this system is a poster-child for when abbreviating 2MASS/SDSS phone number names is a bad idea. Triple system: "A" (LP 213-67) is tight binary with separation 0.122" (CLO 5; mag=12.85, 13.7) composed of M8+L0 binary (Close03). "B" (this object; LP 213-68) is 14.5" away. "AB" comprise LDS 4016. V=17.36(SIMBAD, no ref.), J=11.384+-0.022(2MASS), H=10.777+-0.019(2MASS), Ks=10.399+-0.018(2MASS). So which is the M8V "standard"? Gizis00 lists "A" as M6.5Ve and "B" as M8Ve (Reid02 agrees), however Close03 calls "A" M8+L0. But Cruz03 calls LP 213-67 ("A") M8, whereas Reid03 calls "B" (LP 213-68) M8, and the primary M6.5. West11 calls the star M9, puts the star at 23.6 pc, but hilariously adopts extincts Au=0.069, Ag=0.051, Ar=0.037, Ai=0.028, Az=0.020, which I'm assuming they would only consider valid if the star was hundreds of pc away from the disk. So my bet is that Hawley02's "2MASS J1047+4026" is LP 213-68, so that is what I have assumed for the aliases listed above. TVLM 832-10443 = SDSS J025226.28+005622.2 = WISEP J025226.18+005621.5 M8Ve: Kirkpatrick97,Zhang10(M8),Kirkpatrick11(M8V) *M8.5: BardalezGagliuffi14(near-IR) M9e: West11 Dahn02 lists: M_J=10.83, BC_J=2.03, Mbol=12.86, R=0.1112Rsun, Teff=2676+-66K. plx=39.4+-2.2mas(GCTP). Dahn02 lists more photometry. LP 349-25AB (young M8V binary) M8Ve: Reid03 M8.0+-0.5 : Gizis00(optical,"M8e" in Skiff) M8 : Dupuy10(IR) *M7.5+-1.0 + M8.0+1.5-1.0 : Dupuy10(estimate) Teff(A) = 2660 +- 30 K ; Dupuy10 (Lyon models) Teff(A) = 2870 +- 30 K ; Dupuy10 (Tucson models) Teff(B) = 2520 +- 30 K ; Dupuy10 (Lyon models) Teff(B) = 2640 +- 30 K ; Dupuy10 (Tucson models) Lyon models predict logg=4.9 for both, Tucson models predict logg=5.0. J-K(AB) = 1.02 ; Dupuy10 J-K(A) = 1.00, J-K(B) = 1.05 ; Dupuy10 Age: 127+21-17 Myr ; Dupuy10(Lyon models) Age: 141+23-19 Myr ; Dupuy10(Tucson models) Mass: 0.064 Msun + 0.056 Msun Lithium: none detected ; ReinersBasri09 vsini = 56 +- 6 km/s ; ReinersBasri09 Dupuy10 reports binary orbit inclination of 117.24 deg, so if the orbital plane and equatorial planes are coplanar, then V_eq = vsini/sini = 63 km/s. DENIS J104814.6-395606 M8V: Geballe02(M8Ve),Reid08,Lurie14,Burgasser15 *M8.5Ve: Henry04(Kirkpatrick12) M9V: Delfosse01,Schmidt07,Faherty09,Rajpurohit13 L0: Bouy03 V-Ks=8.92(Hosey15). Teffs: 2500K(Rajpurohit13). 2MASS J09424604+5531025 = SDSS J094246.03+553102.6 = SDSS J094246.04+553102.8 M8e: West08,West11 # V-Ks vs. Mv V-K Mv M_Ks SpT(M) Name 8.571 18.41 9.830+-0.026 8.0 LP412-31 (sec. stan.) 8.69 18.795 9.920+-0.065 8.0 LHS2397a (sec. stan.) 8.735 18.656 9.921+-0.028 8.0 GJ 752B (pri. stan.) ... ... 9.428+-0.019 8.0 LHS 2243 (exemplar)