For each method 10 individual runs have been performed. The average values and the standard deviations of average potential energy <E> have been calculated to compare these two methods. In the Albert's algorithm, <E> has also been calculated by the random sampling method.
In the following table the values of <E> - E0 (E0 is the potential energy of the initial configuration) are listed.
E0 | MC | Albert's | Sampling | |
Solid | -2.0997107500e+04 | (2.76 +/- 2.57)*10E-4 | (10.07 +/- 6.40)*10E-4 | (10.06 +/- 6.57)*10E-4 |
Liquid | -2.0996121740e+04 | (-4.76 +/- 0.91)*10E-2 | (-3.45 +/- 0.51)*10E-2 | (-3.52 +/- 0.59)*10E-2 |
From the table we can see, regardless the bad statistical errors due to the short running time, the results from Albert's algorithm agree with those from basic MC. The random sampling method is pretty good with sampling average values.