Baker_81_ma107_nor100.top- $Q^2$ distribution from Baker 
    The dotted curve is their calculation taken from their $Q^2$ distribution
    histogram. The dashed curve is our calculation using their assumptions.
Barish_77_ma95_nor100.top
   $Q^2$ distribution from Barish  
   The dotted curve is their calculation taken from their $Q^2$ distribution
   histogram. The dashed curve is our calculation using their assumptions.
Miller_83_ma100_nor97.top
    $Q^2$ distribution from Miller 
    The dotted curve is their calculation taken from their $Q^2$ distribution
    histogram. The dashed curve is our calculation using their assumptions.
Kit_83_ma105_nor95.eps
   $Q^2$ distribution from Kitagaki {\em et al.}~\cite{Kitagaki_83}.
   The dotted curve is their calculation taken from their $Q^2$ distribution
   histogram. The dashed curve is our calculation using their assumptions.
Kit_83_o0oo_105_119_100.top
   $Q^2$ distribution from Kitagaki {\em et al.}~\cite{Kitagaki_83}.
   The dash curve is our calculation using our fit value of  $M_A$=1.19 GeV.
   The solid curve is our calculation using their fit value of $M_A$=1.05 GeV.
Barish_77_o0oo_107_101_100.top
  $Q^2$ distribution from Barish {\em et al.}~\cite{Barish_77}.
   The dash curve is our calculation using our fit value of  $M_A$=1.075 GeV.
   The solid curve is our calculation using their fit value of $M_A$=1.01 GeV.
Miller_82_o0oo_105_119_100.top
   $Q^2$ distribution from Miller {\em et al.}~\cite{Miller_82}.
   The dotted curve is their calculation using
   their fit value of $M_A$=1.05 GeV. The
   dash curve is our calculation using our fit value of  $M_A$=1.117 GeV.
Baker_d0dd_110_JhaKJhaJ_105.top A comparison of the 
   $Q^2$ distribution using 2 different
    sets of form factors. The data are from Baker 
    The dotted curve uses Dipole Form Factors with
    $M_A$=1.10 GeV. The dashed curve uses BBA-2003 Form Factors
    with $M_A$=1.05 GeV. 

Nov 24 16:48 NukeFermiGasC12EBind25.eps nuclear corrections
Sep 28 17:02 Tsushima_ff_G.eps  may be same as bottom
Sep 30 11:24 Tsushima_ff_dipole.eps - ratio os Tsushima ff to dipole, f1, cf2, f_a
Oct  1 10:16 Tsushima_ff_file_g.eps - gep,gen,gmp,gmn
Sep 30 18:06 elas_JhaKJhaJ_nu_2GeV_tsuch.eps 
Sep 30 19:55 elas_JhaKJhaJ_nu_tsush_g.eps, I think the g uses the file
Sep 30 23:47 elas_JhaKJhaJ_nub_tsush_g.eps
Oct  1 12:37 elas_JhaKJhaJ_nu_tsush_g_2GeVdat.eps
Oct  1 16:30 elas_JhaKJhaJ_nub_tsush_g_2GeVdat.eps

r_JhaKJhaJ_ma100_D0DD_ma105.eps
r_JhaKJhaJ_ma100_D0DD_ma111.eps

f_a_lin.top - f_a   data and minerva - linear 
f_a_dipole.top _f_a data and minerva - ratio of dipole 
f_a_log -      f_a  data and minerva - log
f_a_log_mod.top f_a dipole ma=1.014 with data and minerva- log plot
f_a_dipole_mod f_a/dipole data and minerva
f_a_polar.top   - gep polarization/dipole, fa errors, fa data
f_a_polar_mod.top looks the same as above
f_a_cross_sect.top -  gep cs/dipole, fa errors, fa data
f_a_cross_sect_mod.top - same as above, maybe points moved slightly 
f_a_dipole_mod_nub.ps - f_a/dipole nub 
td f_a_reduced_nub_010_percent.top- reduce f_a by .1 (10%) amount of reduction of CS
sigma_JhaKJhaJ_minerva.top - minerva cross section with errors
FF_contribution_nu.top - form factor contribution neutrino
FF_contribution_nub.top - form factor contribution anti-neutrino

ddsigma_dq_dff_nu.top - d(dsigma/dq**)/dff nu
ddsigma_dq_dff_nub.top - d(dsigma/dq**)/dff nub
